Just like your original claim in this thread "Someone in the Labor party playing dirty politics." I put it to you that you or Fat George have no evidence of that, it is only an assumption on your part which is not supported by evidence. Given the state of hate that exists between the members of the Coalition it is just as likely one of them tried to tip the bucket on poor Fat George. Maybe you are the troll claiming something that is not true.
Anyway as far as Fat George is concerned, it couldn't happen to a nicer bloke.

Paul1405 - You really are a despicable individual, why do you continually have to use the derogatory term "Fat George", no less than 7 times here.

You are more immature than a primary school aged child.

I have issues with the moral perversions of hetero politicians- but feel that they'll be more than punished by the natural effects of their actions. Also hetero politicians are not trying to introduce sexuality to children- or to present minority sexual preferences to children as normal- they aren't trying to legitimize minority views on the majority. Animals such as lions have multiple female partners perhaps some of their make up is within us. It's an example of wise restraint- of discipline over freedom, conservatism over liberalism. But we can all be weak.

Phil, I am not concerned about your opinion of me, it is of no significance, or of any consequence what so ever to anyone, call me what you like. On another thread you are applauding one of your like minded fellows who refers to others as, neanderthals, maggots and faggots. What do we get from you on that comment; "Thank you you are the only one who understands". Which one of the three is you, the maggot, the faggot or the neanderthal?

Why do I refer to Fat George as Fat George, could that have something to do with the fact that he is fat, and his name is George, and also the fact is, I don't have any particular liking for him.

BTW, do you get upset when some on the forum apply derogatory names to Labor politicians, Gillard, Rudd and Shorten spring to mind, I can't recall you getting all hoity-toity with those of your ilk. Are you biased?

Phil what do you think of a politician who puts on public display a photograph of himself pointing a gun with a caption underneath that reads

“You gotta ask yourself, do you feel lucky, greenie punks?”.

The implied message to his half wit supporters is they should shoot greenies.

Paul1405 You must have a Degree in "the art of the lie", you just can't get your facts right.

You wrote Quote
"On another thread you are applauding one of your like minded fellows who refers to others as, neanderthals, maggots and faggots."

** To make matters worse you deliberately quoted it wrong **

You wrote Quote
"What do we get from you on that comment; "Thank you you are the only one who understands". Which one of the three is you, the maggot, the faggot or the neanderthal? "

** Like usual a false statement here is exactly what I said to him. **

"ALTRAV - Thank you you are the only one who understands how bureaucrats introduce new laws & rules and expressed it in words."

** I am thanking the person on there understanding of how bureaucrats introduce new laws and expressing it in words. ** Lie number 1 by Paul1405.

On the same thread as above you posted these two statements.

Quote 1&2
"Just a small point, you say "Students will be provided with a range of dress ups...such as burkas, traditionally worn by women of Islamic faith"

"But then you say "A spokesperson from the Western Australia Department of Education wouldn't confirm or deny whether 'dressing up' will be part of the 2019 gender education program, stating the 'curriculum is still being developed."

** Two more false statements by you those words were copied and pasted from the article they were not my words ** Lie number 2 and 3 by Paul1405

Link to where Paul1405 claim one thing but the proof is right there.

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=8585#273306

He starts at Friday, 4 January 2019 5:55:07 AM

Not your day, that is the same thread where you tried to elevate yourself to a position higher than the forum moderator, by attacking the source of the article not the content.