Foxy - Clearly you are blind.

1st you ignore this.
Sir Alistair Graham, former chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, said Prince Charles's actions amounted to a serious conflict of interest.

He said: "There's a conflict of interest between his own investments of the Duchy of Cornwall and what he's trying to achieve publicly.

"And I think it's unfortunate that somebody of his importance, of his influence, becomes involved in such a serious conflict."

2nd - You conveniently ignored this which casts a doubt on anything your idol Prince Charles says.
First you stated Quote
"Do you realise that our possible future King calls
climate change deniers a part of the "headless chooks
brigade?" And that he's totally amazed at those who
are deniers of science. He's spoken at climate change
conferences and has even had a book published on the
subject.

So who's the one with their eyes wide shut?
Not me!"

** Are you aware this is the same Prince Charles who stated. in July 2009 **

The heir to the throne told an audience of industrialists and environmentalists at St James's Palace last night that he had calculated that we have just 96 months left to save the world.

The Prince, who is advised by the leading environmentalists Jonathon Porritt and Tony Juniper, said that even the economist Adam Smith, father of modern capitalism, had been aware of the short-comings of unfettered materialism.

Delivering the annual Richard Dimbleby lecture, Charles said that without "coherent financial incentives and disincentives" we have just 96 months to avert "irretrievable climate and ecosystem collapse, and all that goes with it."

July 2017 his doom and gloom prediction failed to materialize, why should anyone believe what he has to say now.

Philip S.,

Still banging on about Prince Charles?
Move on. You obviously haven't read the
link I gave you. It explains things quite
clearly. You're again arguing with yourself.
Lighten up.

Hey folks,

Here's a few light-hearted thoughts on climate change
taken from the web:

A picture of The Titanic going down ...

"If we're sinking why are we up hundreds of feet
up in the air?"
(Republicans for climate change).

"Global warming isn't real because I was cold today!
Also Great News:
World hunger is over because I just ate!"
(Stephen Colbert).

And finally:

"What if its a big hoax and we create a better
world for nothing?

1) Energy independence
2) Preserve rainforests
3) Sustainability
4) Green Jobs
5) Liveable cities
6) Renewables
7) Clean water, air
8) Healthy children
9) etc, etc "

Holy crap you lot are so dumb.
The Climate Change agenda has nothing to do with climate change.
It's about Global taxes, and creating global organisations that supersede national sovereignty.

Useful Idiots = People who fight over the issue.
Smart people = The ones who look who look at what's going on at the COP24 meetings and see what our governments are actually agreeing to.
http://unfccc.int/event/cop-24

Why don't you look at what they are effing saying?
- The words from their own mouths -

"G20 leaders on Saturday agreed a final communique after their summit in Buenos Aires, declaring that the Paris Agreement was 'irreversible'."

"Just this week, the UN’s environment programme said the voluntary national contributions agreed in Paris would have to triple if the world was to cap global warming below 2C. For 1.5C, they must increase fivefold."

Heres a question for you morons;
If fossil fuels are the enemy, why don't they lower production?
Why are they building more pipelines?
- And starting wars just to do it -
Do you think the US military will switch their ships and tanks to solar?

You people are idiots, you're being had, played for a fool to be a willing participant is selling OUR country out.

Yes! It was OURS, but now its not, control now
superceded to global authority.

Bloody idiots, thanks for nothing

Forgot this:

http://www.climatedepot.com/2018/12/03/un-climate-chief-has-solution-to-urgent-climate-threat-we-require-deep-transformations-of-our-economies-and-societies/

Foxy You missed it again, the things I do for you.

First you stated Quote
"Do you realise that our possible future King calls
climate change deniers a part of the "headless chooks
brigade?" And that he's totally amazed at those who
are deniers of science. He's spoken at climate change
conferences and has even had a book published on the
subject.

So who's the one with their eyes wide shut?
Not me!"

** Are you aware this is the same Prince Charles who stated. in July 2009 **

The heir to the throne told an audience of industrialists and environmentalists at St James's Palace last night that he had calculated that we have just 96 months left to save the world.

The Prince, who is advised by the leading environmentalists Jonathon Porritt and Tony Juniper, said that even the economist Adam Smith, father of modern capitalism, had been aware of the short-comings of unfettered materialism.

Delivering the annual Richard Dimbleby lecture, Charles said that without "coherent financial incentives and disincentives" we have just 96 months to avert "irretrievable climate and ecosystem collapse, and all that goes with it."

July 2017 his doom and gloom prediction failed to materialize, why should anyone believe what he has to say now.
_____________________________________________________

Gee guess who is "headless chooks brigade?" ** Give you a guess P Charles
And that he's totally amazed at those who are deniers of science. ** Does he mean the science of doom and gloom that did not occur.

Why can't you just admit he was wrong and maybe you are being conned into believing him.

Armchair Critic,

Please take it easy and don't take things
so much to heart. This is after all only
a discussion forum.

Thank You for your opinions they are always appreciated.

Philip S.,

I don't want to argue with you.

I've said my piece.

However, I don't have anything more to add.

I shan't be responding any further.

I do appreciate your time and effort.

It has been interesting.