The Forum > General Discussion > Climate change stories.
Climate change stories.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Page 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- ...
- 33
- 34
- 35
-
- All
Posted by Armchair Critic, Wednesday, 19 December 2018 10:12:00 AM
| |
All I'm seeing is a bunch of sad old farts whose rightwhinge politics and pathological selfishness means they are completely incapable of accepting basic science. You talk yourself into a frenzy, feeding off each other in raptures of denialism, revelling in ignorance and contrariness.
We know how deeply invested in denialism you have become and how remote the possibility of redemption is. Every time one of your pet theories is shot down you refuse to acknowledge and just move to the next one. It is the flat earth brigade on steroids and is a wonder to behold. But anyway here is yet another story for you to ignore/argue is a one off/say it has nothing to do with global warming/point ot how many cold days there are in Cairns or whatever lame halfarsed excuse you care to contruct. “An extreme heatwave in far north Queensland last month is estimated to have killed more than 23,000 spectacled flying foxes, equating to almost one third of the species in Australia. The deaths were from colonies in the Cairns area where the mercury soared above 42 degrees Celsius two days in a row, breaking the city's previous record temperature for November by five degrees.” http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-12-19/heat-wipes-out-one-third-of-flying-fox-species/10632940 Yup that is one third of a species wiped out due to record temperatures. Absolutely nothing to see here huh. And just look at Hasbeen, after two years of record breaking temperatures up his way he hasn't taken his pool cover off this year, therefore global warming is a sham. Brilliant fellas, well done. Posted by SteeleRedux, Wednesday, 19 December 2018 10:21:27 AM
| |
"All I'm seeing is a bunch of sad old farts whose right whinge politics and pathological selfishness means they are completely incapable of accepting basic science."
- I don't care about 'basic science' - The climate of the planet is constantly changing, do you think the people who lived prior to the last ice age took up a plate for donations to avoid the ice age? Human beings if they are to survive need to master their environment. If that means building a mud hut to stay cool in the sun or protected from the cold and rain and predators at night, that's what we do. What we don't do, is run around screaming our heads off to make carbon trading elites richer, when Chinese people wear facemasks to breathe in their own cities. Posted by Armchair Critic, Wednesday, 19 December 2018 10:40:26 AM
| |
Dear AC,
Mate I am under no illusion that you care about the science, especially when conspiracy theories loom so large in your life. You sure are a loopy critter on this stuff but you need to be careful, people are being killed because of the crap you are peddling. “We’re trying to but he’s chasing us around the house,” she answered. “He’s mad about something on the internet about leftist pedophiles and he thinks we’re leftist and he’s calling us pedophiles. And I don’t know what all.” http://www.complex.com/life/2017/10/far-right-youtuber-fatally-stabs-own-father Posted by SteeleRedux, Wednesday, 19 December 2018 11:05:52 AM
| |
mhaze,
Once again I shall attempt to explain that it is the time involved in the process that has kept oil from being considered a renewable. It takes thousands of years to form naturally and can't be replaced as fast as its being consumed. Oil is considered a limited resource. Limited because we can't re-use it. Oil is considered non-renewable because the main use of it is gasoline and it is a fuel and fuels burn. The damage being done to the planet is explained here: http://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/non-renewable-energy/ http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/sep/16/david-attenborough/backs-huge-apollo-clean-energy-research-plan Posted by Foxy, Wednesday, 19 December 2018 11:10:25 AM
| |
Well ALTRAV, if you have to be owned by someone, & I suppose we all do, the Queen would be one of the better ones to be owned by. A hell of a lot better than being owned by the UN or the EU.
On that, are you sure about that. If the EU now own the UK, [& don't want to let their cash cow go], can the queen own us, or through the EU owning the UK, & therefor the queen, does that mean the EU owns Oz. Then of course the UN want to own the EU, & all the rest of us. This is all too hard. I think I'll go & have a quick lie down. Posted by Hasbeen, Wednesday, 19 December 2018 11:18:45 AM
|
- Thanks for blowing my buzz with that reality check -
Sad but true hey...