Don't you just love Global Warming except when it is cold.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6506599/Polar-vortex-bring-freezing-air-U-S-send-temperatures-plummeting-weeks.html

Polar vortex 'could bring freezing Arctic air over the U.S. and send temperatures plummeting within weeks'

Weather researchers say that a polar vortex could hit the United States and Canada with extremely frigid temperatures either by the end of this month or in January.

Judah Cohen, who is a climate expert at Atmospheric and Environmental Research, said that the latest studies indicate there is a chance Arctic air could push southward and blanket much of the Northern Hemisphere in the coming weeks.

It all depends on the polar vortex, the patch of air 60,000 feet above the Earth’s Arctic surface, according to The Washington Post.

If the vortex stays stable, the winter will be quite ordinary, with its usual cold spells, snow storms, and thaws.

But if the vortex is disrupted, it would mean especially frigid temperatures similar to those which covered the United States in February and March.

Cohen tweeted: 'Confidence is growing in a significant polar vortex disruption in the coming weeks.

'This could be the single most important determinant of the weather this winter across the Northern Hemisphere.'

There is disagreement over the projections of a possible disruption in the vortex.

While American climate experts say it could happen later this month, European experts are predicting that January will be when it is felt.

The findings about a possible polar vortex contradict predictions by U.S. meteorologists who said in October that this coming winter will be warmer and milder than usual.

The National Weather Service predicted a warmer than normal winter for the northern and western three-quarters of the nation - thanks to a weak El Niño brewing.

The greatest chance for warmer than normal winter weather is in Alaska, the Pacific Northwest, Montana, northern Wyoming and western North Dakota.

No place in the United States is expected to be colder than normal, said Mike Halpert, deputy director of the government's Climate Prediction Center.

The Southeast, Ohio Valley and mid-Atlantic can go any which way on temperature, Halpert said.

Hey Philip S,
They're not necessarily wrong; as much as they're in on this charade all the way to the bank.
Prince Philip, Prince Charles and Prince Bernhard are all associated with the WWF;
Now read this:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/climatechange/9246853/How-climate-change-has-got-Worldwide-Fund-for-Nature-bamboozled.html

At the heart of this thing is also Eugenics and a depopulation agenda.
http://steemit.com/documentary/@corbettreport/how-big-oil-controls-the-environmental-movement

Hi Foxy
"Please take it easy and don't take things so much to heart. This is after all only a discussion forum."

Hmmm.... How can I not take all of this to heart?
I don't want to be ruled by foreigners and their weird globalist ideas.
And why should I? We've got everything in this country we need.

They say in regards to free speech that you shouldn't scream fire in a crowded theatre.
I accept that, but what about when the theatre IS REALLY ON FIRE?

I don't say the things I do to specifically insult without any purpose.
I do it deliberately for the purposes of snapping people out of dreamland.
Sometimes I feel like I have to be 'bluntly insulting' so people wake up and see the bigger picture.

It might seem personal, but in truth it's not about any of you.
It's about me, and how I feel about my country slowly going down the toilet.
And in that context I ask again, how can I not take it all to heart?
It's not like there's a whole lot else I can do about it by myself except vent.

200 years of blood sweat and tears building this country just to have our countries politicians give the country away because they could become international politicians after their national career ended.

Tell me did the Anzacs fight for globalism?
Tell me did the Indigenous vote for globalism?

Were we consulted about the issue that we CITIZENS were the owners of this country, and now with all the globalist bureaucracy we are not?

Why because some German parading themselves as English royalty think they own us?

I can't believe Australians became so gullible in a single generation they actually gave the country away themselves.

"Here take it, we don't want it;
We'll rent it instead."

- What a bunch of absolute IDIOTS -

Armchair Critic There is a saying you can't educate an idiot, before I did not believe that but on here I do.

To me it defies rational thinking that someone can so firmly believe something that even when shown something that was stated is wrong they do not even consider maybe or possibly even if only a small doubt would be put into their thinking even as small as say there is a 1%, 2% or even 3% chance that something is wrong we are being told lies.

Fact
Prince Charles on advice from leading environmentalists Jonathon Porritt and Tony Juniper made a statement that it had been "calculated that we have just 96 months left to save the world" this statement was made July 2009.

** that is from calculations made by the two leading environmentalists **

** So July 2017 the world was in relatively the same state as July 2009. So that statement was based on faulty science or other errors or a blatant lie **

In any person with half a brain that should put a small doubt into their thinking on the subject in question.

Not on here.

I know the Corbett report usually drop in every few days excellent site.

AC, to answer your concerns about who owns Australia, I'm sorry to have to break it to you like this, but it actually is, without a shadow of doubt and contrary to what the left would like, owned by the Queen.
It was part of her inheritance when she became queen, in that all that is the Commonwealth was either fought for or conquered by those serving under the King/Queen of England at the time.
Australia is no different.
In 1788 it was colonised and claimed by and on behalf of the ruler of England at that time.
Having conquered Australia it now belonged to England and by extension, the ruler of England.
These spoils pass on to the next generation, and that is why the queen 'owns' Australia.
Get used to it.

Foxy,

The the data in the CSIRO article you linked above was derived from the data I showed you earlier. You'll note from the graphs in the article you listed that only one of the scenarios (RCP8.5) shows temperature increases that are anything like dangerous. The others show, as I'd said, low to moderate changes.

RCP8.5 is used by climate change alarmists because it always yields the scariest results and these are the ones that are fed out to the Foxy's of this world to generate support.

But RCP8.5 is so bad that even IPCC is now considering dropping it from their list of approved future scenarios.

But, given that it helps keep the Foxy's of this world in a state of fear, many alarmists groups continue to rely on it.

"As for oil being a renewable? It's the time involved in the process that has kept it from being considered a renewable."

You didn't read the article did you? Oh well best to avoid anything that might upset the narrative. FYG the article discusses some science that suggests that fossil fuels aren't fossil fuels but are created as a result of chemical actions deep underground. Oil under this scenario is constantly being renewed.

Imagine, unlimited unending oil supplies. A very different take on the world.