Philip S.,

So you think that the Pew Research Center, NASA, Lowy, et al,
are all biased? And this from someone who prefers the
RACV to NASA on climate change?

Well, what can I say? You've said it all.
Shades of Monty Python - here we come.

For Your Information:

http://www.pewresearch.org/about/

Dear Shadow Minister,

You wrote;

“Given the variety of dubious sites that you have sited, you have no moral authority here.”

Bulldust.

I quoted directly from the studies themselves.

Moreover I quoted directly from a Stanford professor who is regarded as an absolute leader in the field.

You don't get to brush these off as dubious just because you don't like what they are telling you. You also don't get to flag your rightwing rags as being somehow more substantial sources when they clearly are not.

It is not me who is quoting partisan journalism rather I have directly quoted Trump and properly referenced the two studies in question.

As to the question of heritage it is Trump who pivoted this to a DNA test not Warren and this was what the bet was about.

If this is really all you have got them you have nothing. Try again with something more substantial or give it away. Your choice.

I know Foxy actually believes every word from the lefty one world government sites she follows & quotes, but what about Steely.

His posts, with all the nastiness they put out, somehow don't ring true. There is always the feeling that he doesn't believe a word of his posts, & merely uses them to empty his spleen on a long suffering world.

There were another couple of impossible papers last night, typical of this last rush of garbage to try to cover the total failure of the last jamboree, with 25000 people all free loading on the public purse.

Hell I thought Foxy might have something to say about the total BS that global warmers print, but no such luck. I guess her eyes are wide shut.

I fail to see what the antics of some bimbo have to do with climate change which, if I'm not mistaken is what this thread is about.
If anyone wants to continue with the bimbo topic, please take it outside.
Now as for CC, I feel that my detractors are so worked up about being convinced they hold the moral high ground on this topic, they refuse to consider the question I have always posed.
And that is, has anyone taken a 'distant' view in looking at the earth?
Say, from space.
I cannot reconcile the notion that humans have done all this disaster and mayhem as has been reported and promoted.
As the CO2 is apparently being created from industries, and these industries are usually corralled in specific localised areas mostly.
Better known as 'industrial areas'.
Now back to the earth from out in space looking down.
What I see and is the case, are these 'spots' which comprise of cities, and some industries.
What I am eluding to is that I cannot relate what I see with what I hear or read.
CC is a relative new subject for humanity to take in, and I am reminded that because of this fact, it is a relatively new science.
Now because science is predominantly based on theory, it is not unreasonable to see why there is so much skepticism.
So as much as I do not deny the existence of pollution, I question the exact extent and origins of it, especially as I and the rest of humanity is being charged with causing it's totality.
By extent and origins, I mean that humanity cannot be charged with causing ALL the pollution, and if so, then where else did the rest come from and exactly how much was due to each source of human and non-human derivative.
So there are two main issues.
Remember, science is theory based, and.
How much pollution is humanity 'really' responsible for?

Hasbeen,

Did you happen to watch the interview with Prince
Charles last night (17/12/2018)?

Are you pro a Republic or a Monarchist?

Do you realise that our possible future King calls
climate change deniers a part of the "headless chooks
brigade?" And that he's totally amazed at those who
are deniers of science. He's spoken at climate change
conferences and has even had a book published on the
subject.

So who's the one with their eyes wide shut?
Not me!

ALTRAV,

Before typing on the keyboard why don't you
read the links I've given so that you know
what you're talking about. The NASA - evidence
one is a good place to start:

http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/