The Forum > General Discussion > Labor might backtrack on refugees
Labor might backtrack on refugees
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Page 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- ...
- 30
- 31
- 32
-
- All
Posted by Philip S, Sunday, 16 December 2018 6:23:47 PM
| |
Philip S.,
You just can't help yourself. Want to know what an insult is - do you? Try reading you first sentence to me in your previous post. I was going to reply to you point by point - but I'm actually rather busy at the moment with more important things. I shall try to find the time for you somewhere in the future - depending on my mood. Enjoy your evening and talking to kindred spirits. You need people who support and understand you. Posted by Foxy, Sunday, 16 December 2018 6:40:48 PM
| |
//I had no problem with him until he came onto nearly all my threads//
Interesting choice of language there. Note that they are his threads - on a public discussion forum. Not threads he has started; not threads he has taken an interest in: 'my threads'. Somebody seems to have rather high opinion of himself. //and turned them into chaos// Yeah, I don't recall that ever happening. Nick just posted in his usual avant-garde style and most of us didn't care; but you decided to make a big song and dance about it and single out Nick for special attention for being a 'troll'. The irony is breathtaking. //where even I did not bother going back.// Because you couldn't be assured of your comfortable echoic chamber. //This forum is made up of a small number that post comments and a lot more who just read but do not login so are unseen so to speak// Yep, and they're all reading my posts that you can't because you've decided you'd rather just live in your own bubble and not have to deal with troublesome opinions. And they all think you have no balls. Posted by Toni Lavis, Sunday, 16 December 2018 7:32:25 PM
| |
//to me the chaos over the past 2 months would turn a lot of people off coming here//
Yeah, but not everyone is you. Sorry, I realise this is a fairly advanced concept for a self-absorbed onanist like yourself. But believe it or not, not everybody shares your views on absolutely everything. And nor should they be expected to. //if you think I am wrong say so.// You're wrong. And NOFX agree: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUZ5gGO0_Pw You're wrong... but you'll probably never know. //Drawing attention to a disrupting influence// A disrupting influence? WTF? This isn't high school, mate. We're all grown up, and quite capable of figuring out who the 'disrupting influences' are around here. I vote for the people so opposed to the notion of free speech that they practice censorship... know anybody like that, Philter? //Try reading that bit again and tell me it is not true// It's a steaming heap of dingo's kidneys, Philter. Nick was the life of the party, and you're just too much of a miserable old bastard to appreciate his whimsy. Posted by Toni Lavis, Sunday, 16 December 2018 7:33:17 PM
| |
Oh, BTW: I assume you consider this to be one of 'your' threads, since you started it. I note that the title is about Labor and their refugee policy. And I note that we're all taking about you and Nick, even though it is off topic and Nick hasn't been around lately. And I further note that it was you who spiralled this discussion towards Nick.
I reckon you fancy him. Posted by Toni Lavis, Sunday, 16 December 2018 7:41:50 PM
| |
Just remember, "There will be no carbon tax under a government I lead".
They have form. Posted by Hasbeen, Sunday, 16 December 2018 8:26:30 PM
|
Quote "By your attempts at trying to make a fool out of him"
Just goes to show your lack of comprehension, my comment was "look at all the threads started after the 6th of December. You will notice they are going as a forum should be conducted." Pointing out a truth, unless you think things are better now does not mean I am trying to make a fool out of him (except in your eyes).
Drawing attention to a disrupting influence is not pointing out a fool.
So do you think things are better now or not.
You fail in trying to raise yourself to a level higher than you are by this comment "Stop doing it."
Quote "You don't have to read the posts of people who annoy you" I don't.
I stated.
"I had no problem with him until he came onto nearly all my threads and turned them into chaos with the help of the few who tried to imitate him, where even I did not bother going back.
This forum is made up of a small number that post comments and a lot more who just read but do not login so are unseen so to speak, to me the chaos over the past 2 months would turn a lot of people off coming here, if you think I am wrong say so."
Try reading that bit again and tell me it is not true, simply go back and read for yourself some of my threads.
Belly
Quote "RARELY see the insults YOU seem to use daily against just about any one
So while a few here are not contributing to open discussion
You at least do, maybe we can post without insulting others"
If I use it against just about anyone and on a daily basis, please supply 5 instances over the past 5 days against different people.
A valid request down to 5, not trolling I just want to understand your interpretation of what an insult is?