'
I don't know of any doctor who murders unborn children.
But there are many Christians who have killed and
attacked doctors and staff, and patients in clinics.'

can't believe you are so ignorant Foxy. Then again Ms Ford showed just how low and lying women can be even with a little girls voice.

Is Mise,

I've answered all of your questions on page 9.

You must have posted prior to seeing my answers.

runner,

There's a difference between lies and facts.
But possibly you may not know that.
As for women lying? Men are guilty of that as well.
We have some prime examples that make the news on a
daily basis.

What's legal got to do with moral ? If people need something to be legal to feel moral about it then you can be assured it is immoral & hypocritical.

Foxy,

You didn't answer the questions at all, you skirted around them.

Dear Foxy,

«I don't want to go over this topic again with you. I was not imposing anything on you simply stating facts. Our state is a secular state.»

Had you just claimed, "Australia is a secular state", then I would just sigh as that is indeed a sad fact and there is nothing I can do about it; and yes, we already discussed the issue.

But no, you keep implicating me time and again, then expect me to acquiesce?

By claiming: "OUR state is {whatever}" you include myself in that evil scheme, accusing the helpless victims along with the perpetrators and this is not on! Since it is you, not me, who identify with the state and want it to exist, it is you who should take the responsibility and not attempt to share it with innocent others.

«And there are laws that we are all required to abide by»

Many violent groups say the same and indeed require us to abide by different sets of their crazy laws. None of those groups are moral and there is nothing to be proud about belonging to any of them. It just so happens that at present, in Australia, the ones with the guns are the state-guys, otherwise we might have been forced to follow Shariah or communist laws instead.

---

Dear SteeleRedux,

«Thus at best you become an enabler, only a step away from the perpetrator»

By supporting the state to persecute the religious, you become an enabler, only a step away from the perpetrator.

We are discussing a theoretical issue because I am yet to see anyone in real life who discriminates against homosexuals, but even if such a person existed, calling me an "enabler" is overstating my powers. I am helpless against the state just as you are - and none of us can predict from which direction its next blow is going to come.

P.S. It would be nice if everyone was homosexual because then we wouldn't have to squeeze with increasing population numbers.

Dear individual,

You wrote;

“I think that considering the noise the gay brigade made about ssm, they should now accept that normal people demand gay kids in gay schools only.”

What the heck are you on about you bigoted clown? Normal people? You wouldn't know the meaning of the word. I know quite a lot of religious people and I can tell you right now there would not be a single bloody one of them who would advocate your nonsense.

So you want to shift them all off to their own institution so that others don't have to associate with them? And what do you think the result would be? A whole bunch more bodies on the rocks at the heads for instance?

Sometimes I really do think a decent slice of your generation are a waste of space now. Life is suppose to be about broadening your understanding of people and their diversity, of being able to walk in the shoes of others, of shedding unsustainable positions, But some of you are having none of it are you. Well wallow away in your prejudices my friend but don't be surprised at how others easily recognise the poison they bring to you personally.