"As interesting as this nearly century-old article might be from a modern perspective, however, it isn’t substantive evidence either for or against the concept of anthropogenic global warming. As documented elsewhere, the warming phenomena observed in 1922 proved to be indicative only of a local event in Spitzbergen, not a trend applicable to the Arctic as a whole."
( 'elsewhere' was graphs of 150 years of the whole Arctic)

I used to believe Prince Charles until The 8th of July 2017 which is the doom date of his claim he made on the 8th of July 2009 he stated that "Just 96 Months to save the world", add that to the list of predictions by Gore and others that have failed to come to fruition.

The others have run away without answering it so anyone.

What is your explanation for the dozens of predictions by so called experts and scientists of doom that have failed to materialize?

Dear Is Mise,

Yup from your article 1922 looks like it was a horrendously hot year, except in Melbourne which in 1922 had its coldest October day since 1872.
http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/1851608?

Or in Adelaide in 1922 where they experienced their coldest Christmas for 65 years.
http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/1865151?

What is your explanation for the dozens of predictions by so called experts and scientists of doom that have failed to materialize?
Philip S,
With so much gloom in our daily lives now who needs doom ?

except in Melbourne which in 1922 had its coldest October day since 1872.
Steele redux,
hang on, Melbourne is in the southern hemisphere, New York is in the northern.
Surely therein lies all the difference ?

'What is your explanation for the dozens of predictions by so called experts and scientists of doom that have failed to materialize?'

because they are like economist that are experts after the event except the likes of Flannery and Gore who make money out of failed prophecies that make the JW's look accurate.