Dear mhaze,

I do enjoy how the Trumpistas like yourself reword the situation to keep some polish on the turd.

However since you have just regurgitated Fox talking points forgive me for not crediting you with anything on this occasion.

It's pretty simple, Trump said he would fork over $1,000,000 if Warren took a DNA test and it showed she had Indian ancestry.

She did, it did, but he didn't.

He is now calling the test 'fake' and says he will only pay "if I can test her personally. Okay? That will not be something I enjoy doing, either."

So do you think the bloke you love to brown-nose is correct and the test was fake? If it wasn't then how are you going to get him out of paying? It will be interesting to see if it matches what that orange buffoon comes up with.

Look I understand these things are just diversions as Trump and the rest of the swamp drop taxes to further enrich themselves and send the national debt through the roof as a result. But the way you and others are prepared to shred so much credibility over defending this bloke is gob-smacking and I am loving it.

"Warren's DNA ..shows that she has..Amer-Indian blood. If she's Indian then so is over half the US population."
Over 160 million have Indian ancestry? Then Trump was a doozie to think the floozie was in the wrong half , betting 1000 grand on evens and welshing. The joint goes broke that way.

Amusing but far from convincing support for Tramp he may very well be the worst not the best.
Not as if that view is restricted to us lefty progressives here, the world is concerned.
World trade, what if we kill it? reintroduce Tramp like tariffs and let the best country win.
Tramp has been a bankrupt, refuses to share his tax details even with the tax office, funny stuff

Foxy wrote.."It was from a satirical site - I thought it was obvious.
How come you fell for it?"

Since she was still reticent to post a link I smelt a rat. So I tracked down the article. It was in the New York Times!!

A satirical site according to our Foxy. Oh dear.

Still the fact that she was embarrassed enough by her original reliance on the article that she was prepared to lie about it suggests there is still hope for her yet. Dearie me, Foxy.

As to Sachs, he's so anti-Republican over the long term that his views really ought to be taken with bucket loads of salt. His complaints about the deficit would carry a modicum more credence if he'd been making the same arguments about the Obamessiah's doubling of the debt. But like all hypocrites on the left, he was silent and even encouraged more spending by Obama to try to salvage his failed attempts to alleviate African poverty. Indeed critics pointed out that Sach's policies "although well intended, have - years later - left people even worse off than before". And his policy advice to Gorbachev and Yeltsin is best forgotten. He's just another failed leftist complaining about someone who's actually getting things done....no wonder you like him.

yes mzhaze some of these 'progressive' women could not lie straight in bed. They hate straight shooters.

whether it be Hilary, Ford and now Warren all caught out as liars. No wonder we have such a swamp among who can't tell the truth. Oh that's right these mob claim their is no absolute truth which allows lies to be truth, perversion to be normal and virtue signalling a sign of morality. What putried truth secularism has produced and what nasty lying women.