Toni said: "That story is from five years ago," You obviously only opened one link that happened to be five years ago. However there are several journalists facing prison for critiquing Islam and I am following their Court case.

//Step 1... Step 4//

Doing OK so far...

//Step 5- Josephus indicated that Toni Lavis may be in denial that nothing specific should be done about addressing these issues- perhaps because of Muslim sensitivities and political correctness.

Step 6- Toni Lavis advises Josephus to cease and desist on the basis of libel.//

Sorry, no, you've got step five wrong. Let me remind you what Josephus said:

//Toni is happy to ignore Muslims grooming and raping children//

I'm not. Since you're such a brilliant forum detective, why don't you tell me where it is that I've said I'm okay with pedophilia? I've never said that; I never would say that; I can't f^&king stand rock spiders, to the point that it's gotten me in trouble with Graham before, so always have to been mindful to curb my language, at the risk of not adequately expressing how much I would like to single-handedly strangle every last damn pedo on Earth.

And then along comes Josephus, who I don't think is quite the full quid - and he thinks it would be... well, I don't know. Funny? Clever? A sound argument? I'm not sure. Maybe he's just a bit frustrated that I'm pointing out the gaping holes in his arguments. But for whatever reason, he thinks it would be simply smashing idea to accuse me of condoning pedophilia.

Now, there are two... no, three things wrong with that line of argument.
1) It's a damn lie.
2) It's not just personally offensive, it's calculated to damage my reputation. Put those two together, that makes it libellous (look it up). But more importanly
3) It's just a really childish and cheap form of ad hominem. You whine about people using the reductio ad Hitlerum as an argumentative tactic; what Josephus has just tried to pull is the reductio ad pedophilium. About as base a form of rhetoric as it gets.

//1. Britain is traditionally a Christian country not a Muslim country//

What? No, it's traditionally a pagan country. The Christians came as unwelcome invaders.

//"That story is from five years ago," You obviously only opened one link that happened to be five years ago.//

Well... yes. The one that you provided, Josephus.

//British Police are arresting persons who critique Islam, penalty up to six years jail.
http://www.businessinsider.com.au/in-britain-police-arrest-twitter-and-facebook-users-if-they-make-anti-muslim-statements-2013-5?r=US&IR=T//

Do you remember, Josephus? You posted the link this morning. Notice how just beneath the headline, it has the date and time the article was posted? And that date is 27/5/2013. It's 2018 now, remember Josephus? And what's 18 minus 13? Yes, very good, it's 5 years.

Lights are on, but the occupants have long since vacated the premises... I'd almost feel sorry for him if he weren't so rude and obnoxious.

//However there are several journalists facing prison for critiquing Islam//

Of course there are, Josephus... and it seems to me that even if there weren't, it'd have been necessary for you to invent them.

Could it be within the realm of possibility that one of our regular posters is a lawyer trying to drum up some business by baiting unwary & genuinely concerned posters by exploiting the loopholes of everyday English ?

Indy,

Not sure about lawyers, but if you're talking about
the realms of possibility and this forum - I'm
sure that there probably are quite a few who think
they are - "men
of the cloth" who post here.

Don't think so Indy, as far I can tell Josephus and runner are a pair of fundo happy clappers gone wrong. This forum is most enlightening, I have discovered you are a big fan of right wing Austrian dictators.

"The far-right Austrian Freedom Party was founded by former members of the Nazi party after the second world war." This is the political party you and the other three are cheering on as the shining light to "control" Muslims in Austria! You gotta be kidding!