David Cameron, former Prime Minister of the UK and
Leader of The Conservative Party once wrote in The
Guardian - "The challenges of cohesion and integration
are among the greatest we face... We cannot bully people
into feeling British. We have to inspire them."

"You can't even begin to talk about a truly integrated
society while people are suffering racist insults and abuse,
as many still are in our country on a daily basis..."

"No Muslim I've spoken to is offended by Christmas, or supports
its replacement with something else - but many Muslims that
I've talked to about these issues are deeply offended by the
the use of the word "Islamic" or "Islamist" to describe the
terrorist threat we face today."

"What we need is a greater understanding of the true nature
of the terrorist threat...By using the word "Islamist" to
describe the threat we actually help do the terrorist
ideologues work for them, confirming to many impressionable
young Muslim men that to be a "good Muslim" you have to
support this evil campaign."

Edmund Burke stated - "To make people love their country, Their
country ought to be loveable."

"Integration has to be about more than immigrant communities
"their" responsibilities and "their" duties. It has to be
about "us" too - the quality of life we offer, our society,
and our values" Such as tolerance, understanding, and
generosity.

peaceful integration,
Is Mise,
Do you think the Left has the sense to stand back & think ? Something tells me we'll have a long wait ahead before that happens.

I just took part in an online poll that asked if we should have a plebiscite on immigration. Only small poll, currently about 5,000 responses but the result? 97% have said yes to a plebiscite.

Foxy, Jordan doesn’t qualify. I asked for a majority Christian/ Jewish country with up to 10% Muslim population.
Jordan is about 98% Muslim.

Dear Big Nana,

The results should be interesting.

So I'll take that as a "No, I didn't read the speech" from Foxy. Just find someone who'll tell you what you want to hear and go with that. And that's called 'objective'. hmmmmm

As to the value of your sources...they make the same assertion about Bourke St. But if you (or they) read the speech it doesn't mention Bourke St. So the sources are rubbish, biased and designed to achieve an outcome, not to fact check.

But that won't stop you believing them, heh Foxy.