AC- Thanks

AC,

Wow, RT has been busy.

The Crimea was part of the Ukraine. Russia invaded it. End of.

As for maybe, just possibly, gosh who knows, that the Ukrainians may have shot down MH 17 thinking it was Putin's plane - who would fly Putin over the Ukraine ? Idiots ?

Yours and CM's posts are too despicable to comment further on.

Joe

You want to know the dumbest thing Loudmouth?
The corporate media reported on those Crimean elections themselves, then it treat us all like we have fricking dementia.

Then we have those like yourself trying to convince everyone the dementia is real.

The Ukraine's story is one where if they get it wrong you know for absolute fact they cannot be trusted to report honestly.

- And don't think a plane full of Russia military didn't suspiciously blow up flying out of Sevestapol a few years later as well.

RT's alright, but I think Russia Insight on YouTube is just as good if not better.

Neither of which are anywhere near being the main channels I watch.
They are secondary channels, the main channels I watch are hosted by Americans, I've told you all this numerous times.

- But if slag n smear is all you've got, go for it.

You wanna crap on Putin, but Russia took the South African farmers when Turnbull wouldn't. Dutton tried. Turnbull prefers PoC (Africans) and Muslims incompatible with Western culture in line with UN policies the sellout.

Putin says Russia is for Russians.
If only our leaders weren't sellouts all as weak as piss.
(Please excuse my terminology)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3556177/Was-MH17-shot-Ukrainian-fighter-jet-BBC-documentary-claims-Boeing-777-targeted-plane.html

Russian Speaking law.
http://www.rt.com/news/minority-language-law-ukraine-035/

The snipers were not Yanukovich's.
They were probably US Assets.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/05/ukraine-bugged-call-catherine-ashton-urmas-paet

I have not watched the documentary.
But I knew about the story at the time it occurred.
One aspect of this story and which could be easily verified, and could give the argument more legitimacy:

- Failure of the new Ukrainian Government to release air traffic control data after the incident.
These are the facts I personally remember at the time of the incident.

There's plenty

I'm curious about Loudmouth 'Trigglypuff' moment.
- And if you don't remember who she is look her up -

I could quote his comment but there's no point, we can all see what he said.

Which part of this story, and I find intriguing why some people go bat-sh-t crazy over simply discussing the facts.

Does anyone still want to say it was a civil war and not a US regime change.

Does anyone question that citizens in the Crimeann region did not recognise the new Government in Kiev, and voted themselves out?

And then also voted to join the Russian Federation?

What facts do you wish to argue with?
And where have I lied, shown bias or not admitted 'I don't know' in regards to the plane?

What reason is there to act crazy and irrational Loudmouth?

'Trigglypuff' interesting word/ picture for a bumper sticker. Or you could put a picture of "Puneet Puneet- "Australian's are racist"". Memes in the real world. Anyway... always very interesting AC.

Hey Canem Malem,
Trigglypuff is the walking talking stereotype of the left.

Why do Antifa and Right Sector both have a relationship to Soros (who was a Nazi Collaborator) and why do both wear the colours red and black?
Or did I just answer that?