The Forum > General Discussion > Diverging Indigenous Ideologies ?
Diverging Indigenous Ideologies ?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
- 7
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
So are you suggesting that Aboriginal people can't be both Aboriginal and Australian, or shouldn't be ? Or are you suggesting that Aboriginality is some sort of fiction, a way to get money from governments ? That whoever claims to be Aboriginal, is just lying, cheating and stealing ? Unless they are of the full descent ? And that there is no such thing as identity ?
IF you are suggesting that Indigenous people only claim to be so in order to get benefits, I would suggest that only people in need of benefits should get them, regardless: benefits should be distributed on the basis of need. But that really is another issue. Indigenous people are still Indigenous, rich or poor, affluent or in need. Or, in your view, they don't really exist, they shouldn't identify as such ? What would you propose in order to stop Indigenous people from identifying as Indigenous, IF you were the Absolute Ruler ? Should such people be fined or jailed, or what ? Stop holding back, Alt Rave.
Joe