//No rush we have all the time in the world now.//

Haven't quite figured out how democracy works yet, have you ALTRAVING? It isn't time that you need, it's numbers: more people who agree with your bizarre views on homosexuality. Numbers that you're never going to get when all your arguments are rubbish.

And in fact, time is not on your side with this one. The data from the survey (and other surveys) indicate that homophobic views are the most concentrated in the oldest demographics, and very rare amongst young people.

I'll tell you ALTRAV, I have one up on you. A few years back we attended a legal gay marriage in New Zealand. What happened was the two guys stood in front of a celebrant, in most pleasent surroundings, made their affirmations, the celebrant did his bit according to law, etc, then pronounced the couple married. The assembled, very smartly dressed guests friends and family, watched on etc, reception after. harbour cruse the next afternoon. I think you get the idea, about the same as many heterosexual wedding I have attended. New Zealand is still there, the sun still comes up in the morning, Kiwi's still go about their daily business, not much has changed since that day.

"Paul1405. I'll be sure to have your ticket waiting " Don't bother I would not want to catch rabies, from some rabid bigots who are hanging out in some dingy basement, crying in their jocks. "woe is me, woe is me!"

The entertainment industry, Hollywood and 'those' US gender studies/ humanities academics have moved on. Forget the Gays and alphabeticals, the next big thing is to convince the Useful Idiots of is 'Pansexual'. - Where the 'mainly'(yeah, right!) heterosexual 'bros' or 'sista's' up with the same sex, preferably a 'friend' (the Left 'Progressives are great on storytelling) for some sexual action.

Of course humanities academics, the 'arts' and the entertainment industry have always had a dubious reputation where substance abuse and sexual capers are involved and yes, there were always those types who would mount anything with a heartbeat. But 'pansexual' makes it all legit, huh?

Meanwhile the exasperated public can look forward to a run of cheap series and movies where the hero gives blow jobs on the side to his 'best mate' while his assertive career feminist partner gets on with her career (and gets served on the side by her girlfriend).

OK, so when will 'Safe Schools' ( a Marxist misnomer if there ever was one!) be ushering in 'pansexuality', or will the 'genderless' push already cover that?

Paul 1405,
Greens mates, the CFMEU, outlaw bikies and ors are already closet 'pansexuals', having their 'girlfriends' in the Big House. The Greens would be wanting to ensure their ex-lag supporters are comfortable in their 'pansexuality'. -Maybe another 'rights' pony for the Greens to bareback, now that SSM is old hat and the Gay horse is stuffed, yesterday's hack?

Should be,
"- Where the 'mainly'(yeah, right!) heterosexual 'bros' or 'sista's' TEAM up for sexual interludes with the same sex, preferably a 'friend' (the Left 'Progressives are great on storytelling) for some sexual action.

ALTRAV,

Well, if the poofs don't care about whether or not we approve of them (as per the Green Hornet), then they won't care about you calling their fake marriages poofter marriages.

Following the rejection of amendments to the SSM bill which would have protected us from the vindictive homosexual mob, it is now being said that the enquiry panel – set up without consultation – is merely reflective of the SSM lobby. That it is headed by the HR Commissioner clearly indicates that democracy and human rights is a dead issue in Australia.