leoj,

Prof. Chris Rissel of Sydney university made it
quite clear in the link that I cited earlier that
"The proportions of men and women who reported
experiences of oral or anal sex has INCREASED
significantly - from 79% to 88% among men and
from 67% to 86% among women."

"This is consistent with increases in the
lifetime experience of oral and anal sex in other
countries".

There's more to read in that given link on this
subject. You are the one in denial - blaming god
knows what. This is the second such study on the
topic done by an institution of higher learning.
You can deny all you like - but the facts are
recorded. And medical specialists and researchers
use them.

You seriously need to move on - you've flogged this
subject to death on my discussion.

AJ, I think Josephus is referring to ChapterV number 116 of the Constitution.
Josephus, jump in if I'm on the right track. Firstly the heading says; 'Commonwealth not to legislate in respect of religion'. Then the actual explanation is as follows:
The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth.
WOW! I can't believe it. Josephus I think you will find that there will be dispensations in this new crap law to cater for this. What I am more concerned about is whether the law is going to interfere with freedom of trade and charge those who choose to refuse queers, as is his right. I don't see the big deal. Muslims (true Muslims)won't deal with non Halal establishments, every race has their particular habits or quirks. I don't see this as any different. If someone doesn't want to serve the queers there are a thousand more that will. They may even be run by queers. I am sure straight people have been refused service, by simply being told, we have run out of stock or similar. The customer will never know and therefore can't go running off to complain.

I believe our constitution envisaged religion to encompass personal practise and implied Christian denominations as has been taught in schools from the beginning. Religious freedoms must only be personal and not imposing on other persons.

However Islam is a theocratic sharia political system imposing halal taxes on food consumed by all, payable to the Islamic community for their benefit alone. This in itself is a violation of a free society, as it is imposing its religious beliefs on persons not of their belief system, and offers them no benefit. To give protection to imposed religion on unbelievers is a violation of their rights.

Islam if given religious protection I believe will be seeking right to marry children as young as 9 years, and the right to shame killings for a woman who has been raped; the right to have multiple wives. These are happening under cover already in Australia, a couple of cases have exposed.

Foxy,

Saying things doesn't make them true. Nor does linking to an academic and claiming that he supports your view. I have already challenged claim before. But you sidestep and present the same again.

There is NO evidence whatsoever of significant numbers of heterosexual women requesting and enjoying anal sex.

However, there is abundant evidence to suggest that heterosexual women do NOT favor or enjoy anal penetration, that anal sex is diametrically opposed to the sexuality of women, a sexuality that deserves further study and emphasis.

To stress again for your benefit, anal sex is a disturbing return to the 1950's compliant, serving woman, and her anus is just another hole for selfish Lotharios guided by the Porn industry, or in so many cases, men who have anal sex with their male mates (men who have sex with men, ie., MSM) and want the same deal, access to an anus, from their female conquests. That is very high risk sex for women, as is shown by research into the transference of HIV to women.

Worryingly, the direction that research should be taking and urgently, is into the emotional and physical abuse of heterosexual women by their anal sex demanding partners.

If some men want penetrative anal sex there are other men who are seeking to service them. QED, leave heterosexual women alone.

Plainly you are so far into your advocacy of anal sex that you never get to meet any women. You might try explaining to them why it is so important, crucial, to the normalising of anal sex for those anus-targeting MSM that heterosexual women must be the cannon fodder.

Heterosexual women are eagerly demanding and enjoying anal sex? Bollocks! How many women do you know who want to be 'bum girls', self-administering enemas, having disgusting mishaps in the sheets and having the running bums later?

leoj,

You should know that the Fox Trot contains a number of side steps!!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-5100311/Up-one-five-millennials-anal-sex.html

It is widespread, organised, sexual abuse of girls and women and happening right now.

Most would weep at the numbers. But promoters of anal sex, particularly the MSM anal sex activists, rejoice in the numbers of girls and women cajoled, emotionally blackmailed, tricked (the infamous 'slips') and raped.

The higher incidence of females reporting an anal sex interference affecting them is being twisted by anal sex MSM activists into 'lets pretend that those numbers are all women who happily request and enjoy penetration of their anus and violation of their femininity and rejection of their sexuality' by some thrill-seeking, dominating, selfish MSM who doesn't care about their welfare or feelings, or health!

You should be ashamed of yourself, Foxy.