Apples and oranges. Incidence does not prove preference, or even consent.

You just don't get it do you, Foxy? What about you find some studies that give some weight to females' sexuality?

Also, where it is the male partner (and usually with prior anal sex experience with males) who is overwhelmingly the the one taking the initiative when it comes to anal sex, what might that indicate to you as possibilities for further research? Research that should also look into denial of effective conception to women.

leoj,

I have provided you with information regarding
the subject you wish to discuss - that of anal sex-
from an institution of learning in this country despite
the fact that I have indicated to you that this
subject is your interest not mine and has nothing
to do with this discussion.

If you want to continue to further discuss this subject
at greater length, as I suggested earlier - start your own thread
or contact Prof. Chris Rissel at Sydney University.
He is an expert on the subject.
I'm not.

Kindly respect my wish to not engage on this matter with
you any further.

Thank You.

Foxy,"..the subject you wish to discuss - that of anal sex"

More straw man. You are perfectly aware that my interest is in challenging and dispelling the misleading impression, the big lie, being spread by unprincipled, manipulative activists, that there are significant numbers of heterosexual women who are requesting and enjoying anal sex.

I have already challenged your most recent 'evidence'. See above.

There is however abundant evidence to suggest that heterosexual women do NOT favor or enjoy anal penetration, that anal sex is diametrically opposed to the sexuality of women, a sexuality that deserves further study and emphasis.

Anal sex is a disturbing return to the 1950's compliant, serving woman, and her anus is just another hole for selfish Lotharios guided by the Porn industry, or in so many cases, men who have anal sex with their male mates (men who have sex with men, ie., MSM) and want the same deal, access to an anus, from their female conquests. That is very high risk sex for women, as is shown by research into the transference of HIV to women.

Worryingly, the direction that research should be taking and urgently, is into the emotional and physical abuse of heterosexual women by their anal sex demanding partners.

If some men want penetrative anal sex there are other men who are seeking to service them. QED, leave heterosexual women alone.

Sadly, girls already have enough issues to contend with, body image for instance.

They need lots of care, support and help from parents, their mothers especially, to deal with men who are browbeating them into highly risky behaviour, as 'bum girls', that is aimed exclusively at servicing and satisfying males, and because of a porn industry (and cynical activists).

http://metro.co.uk/2017/07/18/teenage-girls-pressured-into-painful-and-coercive-anal-sex-because-of-porn-6788524/?ito=cbshare

Foxy,

Regardless of what the PM said,
It was not,

"61.6% of the Australian population votes YES.

38.4% of the Australian population voted NO."

as you stated.

See the difference?

Now that SSM has been legalised in Australia opens the way for religious freedom protections to include sharia law to be practised in Australia.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/dec/15/religious-freedom-review-appointee-has-argued-for-limited-sharia-law-in-australia