My accusation that all media providers provide different programs to suit individual tastes, yet keeping information fast moving and/or irrelevant to real life problems while denying skilled work learning behaviours within programs. Technology programs subject material descriptions are difficult to prove, as everything are: far away; too small to see; happened behind closed doors... excitement by audiences of difficult to prove true, emotional rewards of mere softly spoken words and colourful animated images, similar unproven statements brain induced opioid stimulation drifts over to other unproven beliefs.

Children's programs are: violent; hyperactive; twisted animated figure images; quickly spoken slack/lazy cultural language skills. No media discussion has been heard by myself which criticise children's programs for not providing more than basic thought skill reasoning.

Are Sesame Street puppet characters correct clear spoken character behaviours children should consider good behavioural entertainment? Are puppets sabotaging childhood behavioural pathways? I at first condemn puppets fast speech, Elmo's fast spoken words while shaking body, is their some corporation financing children's cartoons with expressed control over how cartoons deliver scripted words and themes?
I can imagine most readers find above statement impossible to believe. I find the statement very possible to believe.

Having listened to Hillary Clinton on 4 corners express Donald Trump's invention, persistence and reintroduction at the correct time to influence voters votes using 330,000 illegal emails scandal, the difficulty in controlling dummying children's programs shouldn't be easily dismissed.

As Donald Trump made promises to improve US middle class workers lives, lowering immigration intake and fixing Obama Care medical insurance, media report Donald Trump's foreign policy terrorism warnings, fuelling military defence. I theorise foreign policy is not only a distraction, foreign policy politics exhausts listeners attention spans, hearing limited same stories renewed as updates, seeing the same North Korean mission launch night after night, returning the following week.

Julian Assange supposedly received CIA secret information by hacking the CIA, which I find difficult to believe. CIA deals with foreign intelligence not USA politicians personal secrets. I suggest all information has to do with CIA fake spying deemed secrets, embarrassing foreign county leaders which has no illegal activities exposed, which as embarrassing exposures haven't sent politicians to jail, stories are invented fake/who cares old news.

Several years ago, media were constantly reporting Assange's rape accusation scandal as an increased belief that Assange believes US wants him deported to the US and trialled as a US CIA secrets whistle blower, my suggestion as a threat example to real whistle blowers, media are carrying out propaganda as well as conveying threats.
I'm suggesting Assange is no more than US establishment conspired media propaganda story, impressing upon unaware news audiences that US government authorities including the CIA could not stop media from advertising to the world what website address CIA secrets can be found. As few Assange CIA stories are worth mentioning in media reporting, I suggest media are creating headline statements without providing extensive detailed evidence other than a single US helicopter videoed mistaken shooting. “US government has not yet been prosecuted for war crimes”. Now “that's” my fake drama.

All media follow the same path story lines, only ABC Media Watch question simple ideas without accusing media to be conspiring similar propaganda.
Surveys may suggest a percentage of media distrust, yet what type of distrust, what lies are used as propaganda, distrust surveys of truthful concern are propaganda in itself.

What's a solution? I speculate, evening television programs are to teenagers starved of intelligent thought dead boring. Programs like The Block have participants saying and doing stupid behaviours. People walking in and out of scenes stating short sentences. Buildings being damaged ready for new materials, simple destruction.

My beliefs are intended to stimulate Neanderthals into realising there are more than existing behaviours.
Family Feud host laughing at all opportunities. Serious currant affair programs rambling on about rolled over political nothing often not relevant to listeners.

When I was a teenager, evening television was frustratingly pointless. Until VHS recording zipped through commercials, not being an alcohol drinker, finding something to do during evenings was difficult. Playing: chess; snooker; darts... having nothing to watch worthy of spending any significant time watching television. I could suggest, being held at home baby sitting children, limited to watching boring television senseless programs, (100 channels and nothing to watch) could be held responsible for high rates of: family violence; divorce; drug addiction; alcoholism.

I theorise newly produced documentaries are dragged out pointless information, introducing bones, constantly cutting off stories in order to prove statements using old damaged bones and difficult to read subtitled foreign languages; laced with memory interrupting music. Camera scenes edited to show short scenes that aid no informed meaning.

Media's limited information vagueness and showy nothingness drives teenagers deprived of all knowledge to desire entertainment to aid medicating long hours of school work tasks. Driving teenagers and young adults towards illegal drugs.
The political system ignores all responsibility, few verbal statements are heard, preferring to rant about go-nowhere climate change, fulfilling CO2 carbon reduction targets and electricity supplies.

steve101

Steve101

I've read your novel above. I think you should be careful giving support to the ABC as a believable portion of the MSM.
86% of ABC staff vote labor/greens. 14% are coalition supporters. Politicians fear the MSM. Abbot had a golden opportunity to demolish the corrupt organisation of the ABC, but whimped-out!
Hanson is the only vocal politician, with guts enough to confront its bias.
Someday a politician will rise over it, and shut it down!

Bill passes in Victorian state government lower house parliament on euthanasia predominately directed at elderly people wanting to end their lives. Politicians objecting/opposing statements to such legislation, I suggest politicians don't care about elderly people ending their own lives, politicians are more concerned about being seen protecting human life while ignoring many other life threatening issues: military service exampling Vietnam war; doing little to “prevent” opioid addiction by addressing reasons why human behaviour lead themselves towards many deteriorating behavioural addictions, one bad addiction is believing media propaganda. If a survey were to be taken, survey I would suggest sees policies (depending on how questions were asked), believe politicians are protecting citizenry.

Media is creating positive judgement future flow from one defending human life belief onto other not so positive approving beliefs, hence propaganda. Any university approved journalist would be aware of the theory.

A list of addictions provide employment for many employees: gambling, racing, hotels, clubs, sports betting; alcohol industry; psychology professionals; police arresting drunks, drug dealers and users; jailing poor addictive childhood/teenager Neanderthal hyperactive society demanding induced behaviours; no skills intelligence to learn new work skills without feeling learning trauma repressions.

Not having employment in some addictive behaviour control and/or employment leaves: transport; building; manufacturing; cleaning; office recording keeping; medical services.
Police and legal services are mostly a compulsive addictive controller and punisher.

Without many poor behaviour addictions, fewer control employment would need to be fulfilled. More true GDP employment could be enabled. Employers would not need to import from other countries less traumatised by education skilled labours.

Number of deaths while carrying out poor addicted behaviours are lost in comparison to the number of people wanting to end their lives legally. Media's rolled over old age people in pain wanting end their lives, what politicians say is little more than propaganda.

30 years ago on October 20, 1987 many world share markets technically crashed after having a quick run up, dubbed “the crash of 87”. My listening to the event at the time, an explanation given for the crash was US secretary of state George Shultz in fear of the US dollar declining in exchange value compared to other country currencies, George Shultz increased US treasury bond yields from then 8% to 10%.

By the end of the 1990s, any finance media reminders of “the 87 crash”, journalist comments stated no one idea triggered the 87 crash.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_P._Shultz

I accuse 1980s true interests rates are repressed. After The 87 Crash, variable interest rates were suddenly lowered to similar today's rates. Because rates had dropped significantly from high interest rates to low interest rates, property assets valuations quickly climbed. Where I resided, local news print was speculating bridge building infrastructure development, fuelling land purchases at overly valued mad prices in speculated locations, nation wide example, fuelling debt, causing Paul Keating to blame citizenry for reasons Australia had to have a 20% plus interest rate recession.

Below is a chart on bond rates beginning in 1992 and a list of interest rates I say don't match my memories during 1980s. In January 1981 I enquired about variable interest rates from an ANZ bank, to be told variable mortgage loan rates were about 7%. At the time I was servicing a fixed 8% interest loan from ANZ bank.
http://www.loansense.com.au/historical-rates.html

My recollection of 1977 to 1990 interest rates are far more up and down movements, down rates starting buying fuelled with borrowed money, punished for periods with high interest rates, banks extending loan periods to borrowers to avoid borrower bankruptcies. Employment opportunities following interest rates.

This is one example why I suspect all finance analysts charts are invented.

School education is designed to punish human intelligence, punish memory skills, to encourage human curiosity to represses complex thought.
Knowing past interest rate history aids analysing what interest rate cycles are coming, yet media fear bubble stories which rarely ever happen, messes with realistic analogies.

steve101