Another thing I want to quickly say, communism and socialism seems to be on the rise - and I gave everyone the real answers to end all this crap ages ago - remember this:

My idea last year for 'Socialist Base Level Jobs', that take advantage of the 5% unemployed that capitalism requires for a pool of job applicants.
Double dole payment - 'The job you have when you don't have a job', Removing the 'I can't get a job' excuse and of 'Creating a culture of employment within the ranks of the unemployed', based on creating jobs, national projects with training and incentives, doing things to help the government save money.
Remember cost of infrastructure doubles every 10yrs...
Anyways...

I told you all how to do it last year, to finely tune our system of government.
I think the thread I started was called 'Work for the Dole 2.0'

Hi there PHILIP S...

You stated the guns this bloke had, were both legal and were modified? With respect how would you know? I'm in no way questioning your information, but I've not heard of this procedure, nor the piece of kit one can ostensibly purchase, licitly or illicitly to enable a shooter to engage in this sequence of 'bumps'. Thus allowing the weapon to deliver full automatic fire?

Conceding this process was employed by this bloke, how would he prevent a series of 'cook offs' or 'stove piping' as the receiver and barrel got hotter? Especially as this person's finger is being continually 'bumped' as it were? My days on the M.60 GPMG, it was not unexpected to have a 'cook off' after c.100rds if one panicked? And that was a gun designed to dissipate heat, as far as possible during it's operation.

Moreover weapons with a semi-automatic function are often designed differently particularly those of the West, as opposed to Nations of the Warsaw Pact. So it must be quite difficult for any anyone to find this piece of kit, that essentially operates on all types of F/A's? Or is it a case of 'one size fits all'

Thank you PHILIP S.

AC,

Everything bad is "on the rise" in the West. What we now have in Australia - liberal democracy - which is very similar to communism in that it is driven by ideology, not democracy, which is what we had before the Left slipped in the 'liberal' bit.

Now, I've got off the topic, too :).

Shockadelic:
"Pretty obvious.
The "right to bear arms" is defensive, not offensive.
As if the constitution would enshrine the "right" to violently aggress!"

That may be the theory. But it's obvious that some people clearly think and act on the principle that the right to bear arms = the right to violently aggress. And the political and legal decisions regarding gun control clearly reinforce this.

It seems all that's needed to justify aggression is a threat. (eg Trump: If you threaten us, we'll use fire and the fury like the world has never seen.) And if the cultural mindset is focussed on fear and violence, anything can be interpreted as a threat

The lunacy of taking guns off the farmer and wife who recently defended themselves from an armed burglar in NSW is probably a good reason why many in America would oppose changes to gun laws. Crimminals often get off free while these farmers have to put up with such c ap.

o sung wu - The info was from a number of sources.

I was reading the thread a number of people were talking about the guns, at the same time watching CNN (they even showed the mod and compared firing it with machine gun virtually could not tell the difference) which had the story about the modifications, there had been a number of stories on msm about that so I Googled it to see.

Further to your question according to LE the mods introduce a high degree of jamming so they said he must have had extensive practice etc in using them.

The 1934 National Firearms Act regulates machine guns, defining them as “any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger.” Pull the trigger once and more than one shot is fired, it’s a machine gun. Pull the trigger multiple times very quickly, it’s not — and it’s not subject to the same restrictions. Therefore it is legal