The Forum > General Discussion > Trump and Situational Ethics.
Trump and Situational Ethics.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Thanks for your link, to some extent it says what I was saying previously on the issue. The moves by the political elite to mainstream political ideologies that vast differ from those of the evangelicals and the PC culture that punishes those that dissent has created huge resentment, that no one from the mainstream democratic or republican parties were prepared to address. That the Trump campaign picked this up and trashed the PC culture is what endeared these people to him, that he was deeply morally deficient was less of a handicap than the toxic more of the same Hillary campaign.
SR,
In my experience sense is seldom common, and having worked with statistics, the mantra that correlation does not imply causality is a common mistake and leaping to the seemingly most obvious answer and declaring it the only answer lacks not only imagination but reason. This poll does not cover itself in glory showing Clinton / Trump at 51% to 36% with Clinton having 141% of the votes that Trump had only 3 weeks from elections. It would appear that some interviewees for the poll were not telling the truth or they were interviewing the wrong people.
When visiting an actuary friend of mine in California in 2007, the topic of Bush and his likely successor came up. My thoughts were that Hillary Clinton would most likely be the next president. My friend just laughed and said that she carried far too much baggage but in 2008 the inexperienced newcomer Obama came from far behind and beat her convincingly. Similarly, in 2016 I thought that there was little chance that Clinton would lose, and yet here we are, with clearly the obvious failing to happen.