Ok here's another one.
http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/08/05/the-brookings-institute-plan-to-liquidate-syria/

Why here wants to argue the fact that the US has lost another war, and destroyed an ENTIRE NATION for nothing?

If you think this is good, what with the increased refugees from that area of the world and threat to our nation from all these wars you need your head examined.

You want to call me names and insult me before I even respond SR?
What is wrong with you people (not you leoj)
You proclaim to know-it-all?
Well you're just another uninformed idiot that's too lazy to look up facts.

Non Profit / Non Partisan Foxy?
Just like GetUp! I suppose you're dumb enough to buy into them being non-partisan or unbiased and non political little halo wearers as well?

The only thing non-partisan here that matters is that both Democrats and Republicans support the wars, not least because they're all invested in military contractors; not to mention the corruption and blackmail.
Maybe you should look at things they vote for and against.
Also the MSM is complicit in supporting these wars and attempting to put Hillary in the Whitehouse.
They're complicit in the lies and they're going to keep lying and trying to keep up their abysmal ratings with sensationalised narratives based on absolutely nothing.

Blow by blow accounts of Trumpmania are now very, very boring. We have enough going on in our own political swamp to keep us occupied. What goes on in U.S domestic politics should not be our concern. U.S foreign policy and how that affects us is the only thing that counts.

How strange...
Posts an article questioning evalgelicals support of Trump
Then posts another article which explains it.

Trump said he supported Christian ideals during his campaign, Hillary supported illegals, progressives and the pro-gay community.
What the hell are we even talking about, it's all crap if you're dumb enough to buy into it.
This is all just conjecture to undermine Trump.

Why won't you look at facts?
The answer is people are more interested in sensationalised narratives than the facts, the truth is you're all idiots, no offense.

Then you post a snopes link, go look up forbes article 'Snopes Fact Checking the Fact Checkers'.
The simple fact is we don't know the bias of the people employed there.

Dear Armchair Critic,

We actually can get the bias of the sources we use
if we bother to check them out. For example -
I checked on your sources - TruNews, Daily Caller,
truthleaks, and CounterPunch.

Here's a link just on one of your sources:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CounterPunch

And compare yours with the Brookings Institution.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brookings_Institution

Enough said.

No you're wrong ttbn,
The stuff going on in US domestic politics is the only story..
-Or more to the point what is going on behind the scenes.
There's a battle going on to once and for all expose the Clinton machine and bring all that has been going for the last 30yrs out into the open, and it all depends on how it plays out.

If I was to push a story (one of the many hundreds connected in with above), it would be that the Russia narrative is crap.
It was never Russian hacking, it was DNC leaks.
That Hillary is guilty of doing EVERYTHING she accuses others of, she learned this from Saul Ilinsky 'Rules for Radicals'
The big story is that Obama, Hillary and Soros colluded to overthrow the Ukrainian government and meddle in their election, you can listen to Victoria Nuland virtually choosing the government of Ukraine in leaked calls, all this can be proven.
This would call into question Soros use of Open Society groups, and lead to having them banned.

Trump, Clinton and Obama are humans which means they have a corrupt nature just like everyone on this blog. Bush was also supported by evangelicals even though he like Clinton and Obama sold out to the Saudis. At the end of the day they are puppets. If you measure corruption, probably the worst would come from the left wing media who are totally incapable of reporting outside their very warped and often perverted and incorrect narrative. The abc's reporting or lack of on matters like 'gay' marriage, Islam and Israel are prime examples. Trump with all his failures is far more likely to call out truth than the likes of Clinton and Obama. At the end of the day it is my opinion (not necessarily shared by other believers) that Trump is miles ahead of Clinton/Obama in terms of character and policy. I suspect that evangelicals would of much preferred Ben Carson as President.