My, "Australia is not as though this is a Third World country" should be,
"It is not as though Australia is a Third World country".

this coming to a street near you (unfortuntaley not where abc presenters and pollies live)

http://www.news.com.au/world/europe/stamford-hill-estate-in-londons-north-in-lockdown-with-reports-of-armed-youths/news-story/c1856dc716cf6ba5bfe21acc734c5e9d?utm_content=SocialFlow&utm_campaign=EditorialSF&utm_source=News.com.au&utm_medium=Facebook

leoj,

Of course the public is entitled to know what on earth
happened in this case and why it happened. We can only
hope that this case will not be swept under the rug
as others have been in the past.

Shadow, you can defend Shifty Nick and Boozy Barry all you like, you can defend the conga line of Liberals who also had adverse findings against them by the ICAC, but the people can be the judge.

As for the woman's allegations, she should take them to the police and not just air them in the "Court of Twitter".

Do you want the NSW ICAC replaced with the 'Court of Twitter and Facebook'? Is that what you are on about.

Paul,

Thanks for finally admitting that your comments with respect to NSW ICAC have been complete bollocks. As for public opinion, they have already spoken and rejected Labor and the greens.

The woman has already taken her accusations to the police. The approach to the newspapers is to get them to take her beating at the hands of the Greens staffer seriously.

Shadow, when Liberal defendants have been before the ICAC it has been standing room only. I do not defend Labor, or anyone who has adverse finding from the NSW ICAC, they can all crash and burn, like Nick and Barry did! Fortunately no Greens have ever had reason to front the Commission on charges, they must be just too honest.
What happen to Mike Baird, went off in a bit of a cloud did he not? Should I see if there is any "evidence" against him on your 'Court of Twitter' and have it put in Murdoch's gutter press as the public record?