The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Should refugees and immigrants get more lenient sentences in courts

Should refugees and immigrants get more lenient sentences in courts

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 14
  7. 15
  8. 16
  9. Page 17
  10. 18
  11. 19
  12. All
Leo W, "fly into rage" I never fly into anything including a rage. You may have the desire to play amateur legal eagle, so be it, I have no such desire.
Your obvious hate obsession with all things Green clouds your judgement and colors your opinions. example: "the Greens are soft on criminals", an unsubstantiated load of nonsense if ever there was one, possibly you were in a fit of rage when you made that silly statement.

On this topic, no evidence has been produced that shows refugees and immigrants get more lenient sentences in courts, and i see no reason why they should. The only so called evidence is the one eyed perception of right wing ratbags posting nonsense. Evidence it is clearly not.

Leo do you have any evidence? Or are you in the same boat.
Posted by Paul1405, Saturday, 25 February 2017 9:37:00 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Paul1405,

Your comprehension fails you. But then no-one really expects you to do any better than your self-revealing, racist 'joke' directed at Chinese where you speculated there was an export market (conducted by and for Asians one presumes). Here it is,

"Could there be a verging export market here?

"One evening several friends went out to a local Chinese restaurant for a celebratory meal. Half way through the meal one of the party suddenly started to cough and choke. Thoroughly alarmed they rushed her to hospital and she had to undergo minor surgery to remove a small bone stuck in her throat.

The surgeon who removed the bone was somewhat perplexed as he did not recognise the type of bone found. He therefore sent it off for analysis and the report came back saying that it was a cat bone.

The public health department immediately visited the restaurant to inspect the kitchens and in the fridge they found numerous frozen cats, half an Alsatian dog and several rats all waiting to be served up."

Remember our motto here at 'Paulie's Prepared Foods'..."WHEN COOKED IT ALL TASTES LIKE CHICKEN!"

Posted by Paul1405, Wednesday, 22 February 2017 10:04:56 AM
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=7659&page=0

What bald-faced hypocrisy and you don't even seem to recognise that fact.

As regards my earlier post, s21A(1), Crime (Sentencing procedures) Act is highly relevant to this thread and I explained why. I gave an example from Qld and any discussion of this Section of NSW law will give case law examples from NSW.

In your case it is never possible to elevate the discussion. However other posters might like to elevate the discussion above your childish taunts and posturing and get something out of the thread.
Posted by leoj, Sunday, 26 February 2017 10:25:00 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Leo W. you have "cleverly" changed your nick on the forum to no doubt distance yourself from the blatant racism you displayed time and again previously. That post of mine was a cut and paste straight off the internet, from reliable news, not the work of yours truly at all. You who bang on repeatedly about the absurdity of political correctness when it suits, hypocritically wants to take the moral high ground when you perceive there is some advantage in it for you. No all are as sensitive as you, who would cross the street or vote Hanson, to avoid those you believe to be inferior, yet stick yourself on an anonymous forum where you can take um-bridge at something that does not offend anyone.

I am still waiting for evidence that supports the original proposition. It is not forthcoming because it does not exist.
Posted by Paul1405, Sunday, 26 February 2017 11:50:43 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Leo, the CRIMES (SENTENCING PROCEDURE) ACT 1999 - SECT 21A, makes no reference to refugees or immigrants, what are you on about? As an amateur legal spoof maybe you can read something into it that others can not.
Posted by Paul1405, Sunday, 26 February 2017 12:03:53 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
@Paul1405, Sunday, 26 February 2017 11:50:43 AM

I will disregard your defensive bluster and forum bait. However you have not apologised for that disgraceful slur against Chinese. Greens hypocrisy.

@Paul1405, Sunday, 26 February 2017 12:03:53 PM

You are wrong,
http://www.judcom.nsw.gov.au/publications/benchbks/sentencing/subjective_matters.html#p10-470

Just as I said in my earlier post, before you went on with all of that rot.
Posted by leoj, Sunday, 26 February 2017 1:34:33 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Interesting Leo W that you find it "racists" if one makes reference to others carniverous eating habits, as published in the US media, and on a threat discussing feral cats, be it the consumption of cats, dogs, mutton birds or pigs etc etc, something I have no problem with. Some Asian people will eat cats and dogs, that is a fact, they probably enjoy them, so what, I know a mutton bird eater, tried it myself. does that make me racists?

What is racists is the way you support One Nation and the racists remakes of Pauline Hanson, past remakes about Australia being over run by Asians, here relentless criticism of Muslims, refugees, immigrants, and our Indigenous people. in fact, like you she has never had a good word to say about non-whites in general, and you claim not to be racists, a hypocrite of the highest order.

For you and others the title of the thread is nothing but a rhetorical question, there is no evidence that will sway you from your raciest beliefs.

As for your link, what do you conclude from that particular law?
Posted by Paul1405, Monday, 27 February 2017 10:30:11 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 14
  7. 15
  8. 16
  9. Page 17
  10. 18
  11. 19
  12. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy