The Forum > General Discussion > Should refugees and immigrants get more lenient sentences in courts
Should refugees and immigrants get more lenient sentences in courts
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Page 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
-
- All
Posted by Shadow Minister, Thursday, 23 February 2017 4:36:04 AM
| |
Banjo
I just googled and the first page has Oz: Jan 16, 2017 - Three teens charged over the alleged sexual assault of a young woman have been granted conditional bail after two of their families agreed to ... 2017 .Man accused of raping 'multiple children' in Gold Coast home granted bai ... Despite the horrific nature of the crime, the accused was granted bail .. Posted by nicknamenick, Thursday, 23 February 2017 6:19:31 AM
| |
Morning all.
Foxy, AJP, AC, OSW, NNN & SM...to quote AC's earlier post: "I know that by posting anonymously others may not take my comments seriously, or think my comments aren't genuine, but that's a price I'm willing to pay in order to be able to speak my mind." Agree totally. I cut n pasted the text from the reference to bring attention to what it possibly is by being on blogs/forums and expressing your thoughts & comments via that avenue. What concerns me is the actual volume of "disinformation" now available. I'd like to ask a question of you all here and that is: " When do you think the good sources of online 'answers' that one could get by Googling/Yahooing/- wherever it was that you searched on the weird wired web. After what incident did it all dry up ? " For mine, I believe it was just after the London & Madrid bombings. Where formerly you could get 15 - 20 good hits with 'independent news sources' from all over the globe and even some half sensible academically based research to link it all up. Navigation through the cesspit that passes for 'news' today is like being up the proverbial creek without a paddle (in a barbed wire canoe). Today there is a dearth of anything meaningful, as OSW wrote: "For fear it may agitate and perturb us, as if we're all a species of quivering cry baby's who can't be trusted with candour and corroboration from our politicians." No, I believe it is nothing more than perception management, with its aim of creating that Orwellian nightmare society in '1984'. So "You are with us and if you are not with us you are against us...simple as that and you will be treated accordingly." As anonymous as we'd like to think we are online, all it takes is the IP address, your mobile telephone and a 'live circuit' for our minders to track us down. With the thought of preserving some of my anonymity, several months ago I shut down my BookFace account...I've never been happier ! Posted by Albie Manton in Darwin, Thursday, 23 February 2017 9:31:16 AM
| |
Well I don't believe you are Albie , or in Darwin or are human. That last post was done by chimpanzees . Just google it.
Posted by nicknamenick, Thursday, 23 February 2017 10:23:13 AM
| |
In the early days in South Australia, an Aboriginal bloke who beat his wife to death would be arrested and tried, with an interpreter if necessary (or freed if one couldn't be found; yes, true) but not sentenced to death, as he would have been if he were non-Aboriginal, but given two years. Somehow the authorities squared that with the status of all Aboriginal people as British subjects.
However, from the records, it seems that if an Aboriginal bloke was living European-style in a cottage, was working, was literate, etc., he would be treated fully by the law as a British subject, with no leniency. One bloke who murdered his wife in the Mallee in 1958 went off to Adelaide Gaol. The last Aboriginal person executed in SA was hanged in 1862 (for multiple murder), and the last person to be executed in SA was hanged in 1964. 1862. 1964. Clearly, Aboriginal people in SA have usually been very law-abiding since 1862, at least in terms of capital crimes. Check it out on my web-site: www.firstsources.info - Protector's Page. In 1840, Governor Hindmarsh exceeded his authority by having two Aboriginal men hanged on the Coorong for the murder of twenty eight castaways from the 'Maria'. He was immediately (a relative term at the time) recalled and replaced by George Grey in 1841. Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Thursday, 23 February 2017 10:31:02 AM
| |
Begorrah Nick and Eureka !
Typing in the following (Google) search: "chimpanzees post albie manton's opinion's online" produced this wonderful ABC item: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-07/chimpanzees-recognize-bottoms-like-they-recognize-faces/8099054 But of course, the correlation of butts and facial recognition is almost entirely about what we are doing here - regularly posting our opinions about the sad state of Australian society in respect to those who 'represent' us...and there we have it ! The troglodytes dragging their knuckles down the corridors of Capital Hill having far too much power and sway in our everyday lives. If only the average voter in the electorate knew just how much influence he/she/we have individually under our Constitution, the sheer terror it would bring to each and every parliamentarian once those like minds exercised their will and got off their backsides and wrote/emailed to their local/state/federal member, the situation would change within months - if not weeks. There would be no need for concern from the spectre of Ms Hanson's maiden speech, no cause to fear the MSM induced 'Islamic invasion' and no anxiety about the creeping fascism that has steadily infected all facets of our lives here. Educating ones self about the situation requires a bit more than Googling though, but it can steer you in the right direction if you enquire with an open mind. And NNN...well spotted - I'm not in Darwin these days, but living (very happily FB free) in sunny Perth. Cheers AM. Posted by Albie Manton in Darwin, Thursday, 23 February 2017 1:34:17 PM
|
"Newspeak is the official language of Oceania, scheduled for official adoption around 2050, and designed to make the ideological premises of Ingsoc (Newspeak for English Socialism, the Party’s official political alignment) the only expressible doctrine. Newspeak is engineered to remove even the possibility of rebellious thoughts—the words by which such thoughts might be articulated have been eliminated from the language. Newspeak contains no negative terms. For example, the only way to express the meaning of “bad” is through the word “ungood.” Something extremely bad is called “doubleplus ungood.”
Here we have the attempt by the socialist overlords to remove the term "illegal immigrant" defined as "a person who migrates across national borders in a way that violates the immigration laws of the destination country"