The Forum > General Discussion > Is Donald A Dead Duck?
Is Donald A Dead Duck?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- ...
- 9
- 10
- 11
-
- All
Posted by Albie Manton in Darwin, Friday, 14 October 2016 10:37:14 AM
| |
Wikileaks has been releasing documents over the last couple days and word is they intend to keep doing so until November 1.
I heard some of the details regarding some of the emails this morning; evidence of pay for play (special treatment for those who made donations to the Clinton Foundation), evidence of supporting terrorists in M/E and indications that email recipients were aware of Justice Scalia's death several days before it happened this year - ie murder; so now a Supreme Court Judge joins the Clinton Body Count. Also I heard talk that someone has copies of the missing 33,000 emails she deleted, though I didn't catch who it was. Hillary has planned all of this since college days - her fondness for Saul Alinsky, KKK member Robert Byrd and George Soros should be an indicator that all is not what it seems. Posted by Armchair Critic, Saturday, 15 October 2016 2:47:27 AM
| |
Latest Wikileaks Revelations on Hannity
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9msnfCR4OE Jill Stein: Crooked Hillary More Dangerous than Trump http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwXbPIgFWgs ‘Wet Works’: Podesta Email Makes Assassination Reference Days Before Scalia Death http://www.infowars.com/wet-works-podesta-email-makes-assassination-reference-days-before-scalia-death/ Posted by Armchair Critic, Sunday, 16 October 2016 4:21:31 PM
| |
I thought I'd add a few more links and see what the anti-Trump brigade have to say about it.
First Hannity: New FBI Documents And Wikileaks, Clintons Exposed, Media Bias Statistics http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShPtSYbQ4vA Next, a telling interview regarding Hillary with Bill Clinton's former girlfriend http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZ5FytrS3qo A link I posted some time ago: A timeline of the Clinton's including cocaine trafficking http://prorev.com/connex.htm 30yr old allegations of rape committed by Hillary and some revelations about cocaine use and smuggling as outlined in the previous link. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SSa9tTa0-k *Note Cathy O'Brien's mention of New World Order. Finally a more recent interview (yesterday) with Cathy from the previous link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XqWpu8mPU0 Nobody has commented on Trump / Clinton for a few days. I guess I pushed the issue a little too hard. But you guys acted all smart when you wanted to say how bad Trump was. So what do you all have to say about this stuff? Do you really all think I just make things up? Don't forget her health, the lies, endemic corruption at all levels of government and a complicit media. I've explained that I have a nationalist position rather than a globalist one and that I hope we can avoid a war with Russia. Can any of the people who oppose Trump give any reasons at all - in light of all this information why Hillary would be better for America and the world? - Because I just can't see it. And if someone else can, I'd really love them to explain it. Posted by Armchair Critic, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 4:45:34 AM
| |
Hi AC,
To answer your question seriously, it may well be that Bill could be getting a blow job at a Manhattan intersection at 5 pm on a Friday (purely hypothetically, of course: surely not ?), with Hilary permanently comatose next to him, and she would still make a less dangerous president than Drumpf. Drumpf reminds me of too many school bullies for me to want to recall. And he could still get elected. Ghastly choices. Roll on, 2020: Michelle Obama for President. Cheers, Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Wednesday, 19 October 2016 10:26:56 AM
| |
Hey Loudmouth,
I actually heard a few days back Roger Stone say Hillary may yet be replaced with Michelle Obama. It seems doubtful to me but maybe they're looking at the long game. Hillary may win, but I'm honestly not sure Trump supporters will let it lie. I could argue the electoral fraud factor, or the fact that she really shouldn't even be running because of firstly stealing the nomination from Bernie Sanders and secondly because of email scandal issues which should have made her inelegible to run; only Comey and Lynch didn't prosecute her. She may win, but all of these Wikileaks releases and scandals might keep bubbling to the surface and take their toll before she's even inaugruated. I thought about what you said about seeing him as a bully. He does come across as an rich 80's type arrogant egotistical blustering fool at times, I won't deny it. The media do paint him as being hard on minority groups, though I'm sure they push the issue as campaign strategy. I think Hillary might be just as much of a bully behind the scenes too though; if the reports I've heard are correct. I also think the media really have done an exception job minimising attacks on Clinton while maximising the attacks on Trump, I'm don't believe she would win in a fair election or without the media bias. She wouldn't have won the nomination, that's for certain. I've made my case for Trump, so I'm not going to be hard on anyone because they feel differently; though its hard for me to understand why in light of all the damning issues that surround her. I do tell you all many of the things going on behind the scenes though, and in many cases I told you before it's reported on. I've been fairly accurate with my shared Trump info in that sense. Posted by Armchair Critic, Friday, 21 October 2016 12:57:21 AM
|
As I'm infrequently on line these days, what are the rumours on WikiLeaks releasing detailed information on the content of HRC's leaked/fudged emails... ?