I thought using zombie last post was once too often.

Several times, I thought to mention 2 “The Simpsons” scenes:
(1) Homer was trapped with no where to go, zombies walking towards Homer saying, “brains, we want brains” after a zombie using zombie knuckles knocked on Homer's head... hollow sounds had zombie walking away, still saying “brains, we want brains”.
(2) a quick image of about 8 zombies sitting at a table, each zombie had a breakfast bowl containing a brain.

Any person who can really think, would easily understand how educated people are: very frustrating to talk to; stubborn in their fixated beliefs. Zombies believe: magical god; devils; creationism; democracy; capitalism is not rigged to steal people's money; spiritual mediums, communicating with ghosts. Even with all the evidence against 6 days literal creationism, religious people feel traumatised if they can't believe what they feel is true. The more evidence prompts such people to change their minds, the more fixated no-thinking beliefs become.

These no-thinking people are easily parted with their money, using any fixed beliefs zombies care to believe.

The idea zombies need to eat brains, has been around for decades.

The establishment are having a joke at the expense of people who believe what they're told to believe and those who can't stop believing what they believe to be true.

May, 27, Friday evening, I looked at my television's electronic guide to find on 9GO!... 2, 1 hourly episodes of “Izombie”, guide details read, “Pilot... A medical resident turned zombie works in the coroner's office. With each brain she eats, she inherits the corpse's memories helping her solve crimes”.

Series character Izombie actors are acting intelligent, otherwise, I assume, the program may not hold people's attention who appreciate good clear English conversation between characters.

My conclusion to why bringing real zombie intelligence to people who realise educated people are often zombies, who believe everything zombies told by religious people and media are believed true, aids future trust in Apocalypse is coming scams, we won't mess radio listeners around because listeners know too much.

Gives meaning to Zombie Apocalypse.

May 29, Sunday morning 10.14 AM Channel 10 introduced, said by the program host, to be Australia's favourite psychic medium Suzie Price. Suzie Price was asked to tell her story. Host says, “tell us the story about how you came to talk to the other-side”. Suzie Price said, “I was just seven at the time, I was hit by a car and had a near death experience, I was unconscious for a short time, and I remember seeing a spirit or an angel, and she had a beautiful bright light around her, and big blue eyes, and I felt the most amazing sense of love, unconditional love that I haven't felt before, I said to her, I want to stay with you and she said, you had to come back, and when I came back, months after that, I used to have spirit people visiting me in my bedroom. For months after that, it was a confusing time”.
One host stated, “I must admit, I am a sceptic, but we get a lot of people saying we shouldn't be doing these segments”.

Suzie Price eventually asked two elderly women to come out of the studio audience to have their stories told.

Removing a single advert, the entire performance took 19 minutes.

Firstly, listeners have to believe in ghosts. Believers in religion would want to believe in ghosts. Elderly people would want to believe in an afterlife as their own death comes closer to reality. People feeling mental depression after losing loved ones, would love to believe in spirits. After a loved relative dies, having delusions of talking to missed loved ones who died in order to avoid on coming mental depression, is all very feel good easily believed. Delusions of spirits, replacing boredom of being alone, can be a feel good is true imaginative hidden intelligence.
Delusional people may appreciate Suzie Price possibilities of spiritual contact.

I say, it is a paid by an establishment media's job to keep audiences emotionally stimulated, redirecting possible calm rationalising thought towards emotional: shocked; surprise; outrage and fantasy; program hosts and invited guests laughing at every perceived humorous sentence. It is media's job, to appeal to audience's “child within”.
Media are not a thinking person's informative medium. Media are about: emotional stimulating music; scary stories; shocking murders; romantic love stories going wrong bumpy rides; gun shooting wars; “Marvel” comic stories; conflict between murder investigating detectives and police captains; politics are more ambitions and conflict between two political parties. Some programs seem intelligent, yet are more redirecting topics towards rolled over repetitive shifting around stories.

Media and Education systems don't express to young easily influenced emotional children, to how self-gratifying beliefs stimulated by emotional rewards are not always to be believed.

Again, I say establishment want people to be emotional child-like decision makers. Children can't mature into rational thinking adults because children through schooling and media programs, are not allowed to progress thought processes past children stories and emotional rewarding stimulation.

Slow news story day on Friday May 27. Bill Shorten calls Donald Trump “barking mad”. Malcolm Turnbull gets to look prime minister material on commenting on Bill Shorten's probable future U.S. president Donald Trump is “barking mad”. What political party does Bill Shorten belong to? Is Bill Shorten a closet Liberal?

I again state, it does not matter whether Liberal or Labor win elections. Two political parties criticising each other in the media, looks separation between parties, good propaganda.

Other good democracy propaganda seen on Australian television, exampling: several Asian countries democratic parties are at the point of fist fighting in parliament over passing a bill through their house. Zombies believe what they see, prompting first memories of separation between two parties. Zombies can't think to even consider faked performances to show visual evidence through world media news, democracies are truthful two separate political parties wanting policies passed into laws. Zombies can only believe first assumption coming to memories conscious awareness. Reinforcing future similar prompting memories and quick no thought involved judgements.

Prime Ministers of Australia between 1949 to 1975:
Robert Menzies 1949 to 1966.
Harold Holt 1966 to 1967.
John McEwen 1967 to 1968.
John Gordon 1968 to 1971.
William “Billy” McMahon 1971 to 1972.
Gough Whitlam 1972 to 1975.

All the Prime Ministers are Liberal except Gough Whitlam.

Memory tells me Harold Holt was a seemingly capable person to continue the Liberal Party's people's government of choice for many years. Harold Holt drowned, his body was never found. Conspiracy theories that a Chinese submarine grabbed him while he was swimming off a beach.

My conspiracy theory is, under Liberal Party leader John Gordon won the federal election in 1969, that by the time Billy McMahon landed the job as Liberal Party prime minister, the Liberal party had undergone many leadership battle division media news, eventually leaving Billy McMahon, a seemly: incapable; spoke with a vibrating sounds, Liberal Party leader to win the 1972 election against Gough Whitlam.
My theory being that the Liberal Party wasn't the party to take responsibility for leading Australia out of a long period on low inflation, into inflation approaching 10%.
Gough Whitlam and his crew were the perfect distraction, new socialist policies and loan scandals to lead Australians into excepting all the blame placed on Labor Party's many introduced socialist policies, without blaming foreign lead world order establishment, USA and Europe as they also experience high CPI consumer products inflation.

U.S. Richard Nixon could blame early 1970s high inflation war economy involvement on the Vietnam War and OPEC oil shock. Water Gate scandal great distraction and democracy process in action propaganda exercise.

Gough Whitlam didn't win his first term 1972 election, Liberal party placing Billy McMahon as Liberal Party leader, intentionally lost the 1972 election.

In 1994, after what happened between 1987 to 1992. October 1994, run up to10% CBA bank bond interest rates. Borrowing money at fixed interest rates or part fixed interest rates to avoid being court by increasing variable interest rates. Fixed interest rates hedging tactics against increasing variable interest rates. As borrowed finance interest rates increase, fixed interest rate borrowed loan paid out, favoured borrowers.

If people had fixed interest loans in say June 1989. 1990, 20% interest rates would earned borrowers an easy payout profit. My assumption would be, banks weren't lending fixed interest rate loans on or part of long term mortgages, during 1980s.

From October 1994 CBA bank bond reached 10% yields, yields declined to 4.5% by 1998. Borrowed money interest rates declined, fuelling share market boom. Any person paying out fixed interest rate loans after October 1994, lost money on the difference between borrowed fixed rate to pay out fixed rate as new loans were cheaper as years went by. In other words after 1994, borrowers were tricked again, if by considering free money markets forces are fixed.
Property price valuations fell while loans using fixed interest did not fall.
My assumed common sense says, as interest rates decline, property valuations increase. Instead both declined as shares increased.

What voters should be demanding from politicians, are assurances that sudden policy changes, exampling Keating 1990 to 1992 will not happen.
No one will ask serious questions because media controls questions media listeners get to hear.

Why doesn't some person ask, when does Australia get a royal commission into: 1970s stripped assets out of investment companies, bottom of the harbour scheme; 1998 AMP IPO float, where shares were promoted at $20 a share, opened at $20 a share, quickly spiked at and were bought at $34 a share, quickly falling back to $20 a share. John Howard saying an inquiry will follow. Never hearing anything else thereafter.
I was told by the local financial adviser, he was advised by ASX to tell customers to buy AMP at any price.