Because thinking learning processes have been traumatised, workers find learning new skills difficult. Because every person has the same problem, few people can think, to point out reasons, while drinking beer at the local hotel, medicating traumas.

Motor vehicle insurance companies consider aged under 25 years olds, are high risk insurance liabilities. Insurance policies are cheaper if under 25 years drivers are restricted from driving insured vehicles. Why? Because school leavers thinking processes are messed with by mentally stressful education. Brains are so messed with, making instant poor decisions based on how they feel, how mental traumas feel, rather than thinking first before deciding. Most young adults don't want to hear and or read anything that increased thought. Which is what I am doing.

Educated people are stupid, regardless how well educated people can spell, because every educated person are educated that they don't know any better, even after many years have passed as an adult.

Educated people are more concerned with how they feel in the now moment. Trying to repress anything that makes them feel increased traumas. What feels bad is wrong.

Poor thinking traumatised people believe what they're told, having been told the same lies all their lives. Jobs are lost; large sums of money is lost and or stolen; mental depression sets in, what do they do? Commit suicide. Workers can never seem to realise booms and busts are contrived. That would mean workers had to think for themselves.

I have more readings on the subject that few people will read, merely because their more into ignoring anything that feels like learning:
http://deepthought101.simplesite.com

What does the media do? Once and a while, listeners who begin to watch prime time boring 7.30 report, catch a glance at the suicide story. Next day: listeners hear Bob Cosby molesting reminders; Johnny Depp and his 2 dogs reminders; politicians are on the campaign trail. Whatever it takes to pander to badly traumatised badly educated people who don't have enough emotional self-programming ability to realise school education is a natural selection process for available employment and meant to allow people to keep themselves dumb. School education programs human brains to scan memories for what is known, based on trivial pursuit knowledge, not to think about doubtful assumptions, that everything is a manipulating lie. That faked democratic governments regulate laws, protecting workers from faked economic system which regularly steals workers money, blaming lost money on capitalist free market forces overseas commodity pricing.

Without traumatising mental depression education, listeners would not be stupid enough to believe the many lies: religions; democracies; capitalism; Mars Rovers; DNA; pictures sent back from Pluto; Voyager space probes that have no relationship to Sun's gravity, Voyagers travelling out into space never to return.

Because many areas outside city centres are mostly occupied by: steel worker; farm labourers; mine workers, working class, I say, education is made more traumatising. Forcing unprepared for schooling children, needing to catch up to city standards by forcing the same teacher bullying tactics that doesn't work because information is boring, confusing and pointless.
Parental and students reasons that because most workers will not use graduate HSC knowledge and or are too mentally stressed to learn. Education authorities use excuses that education is about standardised learning to ensure evaluating students grades equally for future employment.

I may be accused of raising knowledge “bar” too high for any readers to care to want to read my readings. That is because the bar is set too low by people who start posts that appear to have a point only to read posts as more of a redirection from the topic. The few Interesting topic headings turn into uninteresting readings. All becomes excepted “group thought”.

I vaguely remember turning to ABC Lateline during mid May 2016, I do remember seeing a story on Aurukun School Queensland. The most relevant scenes where:

(1): Secondary school students sitting in a classroom, not looking happy, students looking down at books. Teacher asked students what the fourth would was. Students replied “should”. Students were asked by a standing male teacher to spell the word should. Many students spelt the word should.

(2): The last scene showed a game of football. An elderly teenager said, they would rather be playing football.

Media has the blame being placed on parents; parents blaming: police; the mayor; god. Parents are not heard to be blaming school teachers or a principle. Teachers, how teachers teach are not held responsible for students violent behaviour.

My belief is that once children understand the basics of phonics, sounding out letters and exceptions to the rules: au; gh; tion, etc. children could read by themselves, for as long as children don't become mentally exhausted. Reading interesting readings, increasing the difficulty as readers read words as pictured images, reading faster. After a year or more of reading and typing out some stories, I doubt spelling would be a problem.

Add month of maths, being students are not suffering from memory traumas as government school force students to endure. The period of educating children would be much shorter, about 10 years shorter. Because a correct education would be 10 years shorter, children could wait until children's emotional self-programming physical movement has concluded.

Having done as the above suggest, two thirds of all school teachers would not be employed. Teachers, standing in front of children redirecting thoughts onto boring zombie tasks, counting 4 worlds across a page to read out a single word, then to be asked to spell the while students are looking at the word, is deliberate sabotaging by punishing learning behaviours.

Zombie can't think teachers who have never done anything other than word processing, became teachers because all they could do was word processing. Teachers and principles are told by education system colleges, how to teach children.

Syrian refugees entering Europe were said to be well educated, English speaking people. It seems every well educated European person speaks English. Having met a backpacker from the Netherlands, he said if you can't read English, education becomes limited.

Syria is undergoing a civil war:
I have stated earlier, if aged 5 to 6 years children attend school without being shown by parents how to read and do maths first. Students held in classrooms, will begin to self-medicate delusional predominately visual, simple information distractions.

Football games are enjoyed because football games are visual imaged enjoyments, the opposite to classroom teacher bullying forced labours. Sports are loved because sports are what young children enjoyed the most to distract traumatising classroom lessons. Adults love child intelligent sports, enjoying their own childhood subconscious relief from classroom repressing environments.

Syrian children after entering schools, learning to speak and read English using Western teacher standing in front of a classroom techniques, having no parents guiding children to speak English before first attending school. Traumatised children in need of simple visual distractions, on seeing television news stories, men with black scarves seen with white Islamic writing ISIS, children keen to feel distracted by something simple to understand yet important, say, “that's cool”. Eventually join ISIS.

I say, education systems have ideas to limited knowledge to learners. As media and politicians spout ideas of maths and science are important for next generation of learners. By the time students are allowed to do any science, students are in high school suffering from mental stress, early stages of repressed merely coping mental depression.

If students started school aged 9 years, reading as suggested above, having passed emotional feels good is easy to remembered as true, feels bad is repressed as false, early childhood learning behaviours. Students could go directly to reading about science, remembering words with correct spelling as children read.

Education departments would need to get rid of many teachers, meaning a loss of academic zombie employment.

Next, deliberate sabotage is reading material: books are too think to come to a usable conclusion. Millions of books with too much to say, having too little worth reading. War and Peace: having recently watched the last hour of the Henry Fonda version. The movie was pointless and boring to watch. Peace on the same title as war, means the peace being meant is “rest in peace” chiselled on grave stones. The word Peace is one of those Apocalypse is soon to come attention grabbers.

Moby Dick: a story about a giant white whale, being pursued by an Old Testament preaching whaling ship captain. I assume the book would be difficult to read, having spoken in twisted English words being in whaling common class speech, “aarrrr”.
I assume, religion being big when the book was first written, the giant white whale, being big and white, is the god of whales. Sinking the whale ship was about god's human sacrifice tribute to whales.

Tale Of Two Cities: my mother said, she was forced to read the book, she hated every minute, she said, it was a horrible book the read.

Apart from illegal activities, Aurukun students need to be praised for rebelling against bad schooling. Media need to investigate why students are rebelling.

The media work for the establishment, that the media are the confidence tricksters, will never blame school education for traumatising children's thinking processes, being that, media tell badly educated stupid zombies what to believe, allowing badly educated zombies to scan memories for one simple feel good belief, for every single simple story prompted comparison.

Innovation is a nice sounding word. To innovate two or more known ideas into a single new idea. School education is about many pointless ideas relating to nothing worth remembering. Maths is only a calculation of numbers. No innovation can be explained using maths until maths can be proven to have a relationship to ideas. Maths can make students stupid by distracting probable intelligence ideas away from being realised. Maths: may as well read war and peace, to be redirected by pointless readings.

School education merely sets students up using pointless information, to test students capabilities, while being traumatised. Nothing can be learned from school education that couldn't have been learned quicker and easier by being provided with relevant book picture images and reading materials, with a little bit of adult guidance.

Book reading material provides words that often can only describe simple ideas. Books can confuse by stopping short of complete thoughts. Starting a thought that ends nowhere punishes thinking behaviours. Add a need to feel good about what's being learned, in an environment of teaching simple word spelling concerns.
If learning was merely getting all spelling correct, students trying to enjoy easiest of learning processes, self-conditioning themselves towards zombie behaviours.

How much argument needs to be provided before readers take notice?