The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Sex talk with little niece

Sex talk with little niece

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All
Dear Paul,

What's wrong about giving people the benefit of the doubt?

A paedophile would find no support in my words, but others who are passive readers that face a similar problem may benefit.

The rush to condemn and convict has turned a relatively infrequent issue into a major societal break-down.

I have no trust in the regime's crocodile-tears, claiming genuine "concern for children's welfare". Where is this concern for example when they incarcerate the innocent children in schools for about 12 years? What's truly happening is that the regime is eager to produce a gap between generations so that it can enter that gap itself - and it just happened to find a golden opportunity for its sinister plans in the sexual abuse of children, which then allows them to portray themselves as "saviours" as well as to stage expensive royal commissions to provide entertainment for the masses, banking on their pornographic attraction for gallows.

The mistrust of adults by children and the fear (thus avoidance) of children by adults is far more damaging than the occasional sexual abuse, wrong as it is.
Posted by Yuyutsu, Sunday, 1 May 2016 10:52:41 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Yuyutsu,

I agree that the OP should be given the benefit of the doubt.

Apologies to you for not replying earlier to the point you made about fears giving rise to more fears. Examples,

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/22/opinion/sunday/judith-shulevitz-hiding-from-scary-ideas.html?_r=0

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/11/13/safe-spaces-on-college-campuses-unconstitional-say-law-experts.html

'Safe' places for women being proposed by feminists are unquestionably aimed at hardening the feminists negative stereotype of men and boys as threats to women and girls. "If there is a need for safe places 'they' MUST be a threat, right?" and so the neural pathways are laid. Nasty.

In PC Oz, any older gent who rests on a park bench to rest and enjoy nature is now to be regarded with suspicion. A school near me was in lockdown a few years ago after a vigilant teacher noticed an older bloke standing with a hand on the fence of a school. The fence is a metre off the pathway.

After the poor old gent was taken away and interviewed by police it was found that he had been walking the same route for years, but was suffering more from a chronic health problem. He is now unable to make the bus seat without a stop. You'd think that one of those women teachers who were grouped up in strategic vantage points to monitor his movements might have taken a glass of water to him to enquire if he was OK.
Posted by onthebeach, Sunday, 1 May 2016 3:02:18 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Kurtis Child protection is like robbing a ba nk. A teller might want to give you money but wont. You mihgt be tempted to take advantage but wont because of jail. It should be the same with children but our rotten world wants to commercialise anything and everything. You could get a job with FBI as a decoy to catch pedeos. cheers
Posted by laz91, Wednesday, 4 May 2016 11:35:16 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy