Suze,

Your comment on the latest massacre in the US by Muslims?

Her friend.
http://abcnews.go.com/International/female-san-bernardino-shooter-tashfeen-malik/story?id=35589386

Let's not talk about those two scumbag Muslims, this woman fled Iran in the 1980's to escape the fanatics and died at the hands of just such people in San Bernardino:
http://www.bustle.com/articles/127604-who-was-bennetta-betbadal-the-san-bernardino-shooting-victim-was-devoted-to-her-family-and-her

Get it through your heads o you Gütmenschen there's no such thing as a moderate Muslim, Jihad with words is still Jihad, it still has the same goals and the Koran permits violence if talking doesn't work.

jom: and the Koran permits violence if talking doesn't work.

In fact, the koran insists on it.

Funny how they never shout "This is for your casual racism and Islamophobic attitudes you bunch of ignorant Chavs". It's always "Allahu Akbar", "This is for Syria", "You will never know peace until you get out of Muslim lands" and so forth.
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/12/05/this-is-for-syria-machete-wielding-london-tube-attacker-slashes-mans-throat/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social

Suseonline seems to think that. since more people are killed by right-wingers than muslims (see more below) then we are misplacing our concern and showing our prejudice.

By the same token, since 80% of rapes are done by acquaintances, our concerns over strangers raping is misplaced. Our outrage over Adrian Bayley (rapist of Jill Meagher) was, by this 'logic' misplaced and showing our prejudices. I'm sure Suseonline will go along with that.

When you see a number that looks to be a stretch and certainly startlingly new such as "you-are-more-than-7-times-as-likely-to-be-killed-by-a-right-wing-extemist-than-by-muslim-terrorists" the first thing you should do is check its bona fides. Well that is unless you really like the claim and its suits your prejudices, in which case you simply shout it as unassailably true and use it to make whatever daft point you want. Yes, I'm talking about Suse here.

When you look into the claim it begins to fall apart. Firstly, the report on which the number is based doesn't say right wingers kill more than muslim terrorists. Its says that non-jihadist terrorists kill more than jihadist terrorists and that those non-jihadists comprise those who hold "right-wing, left-wing or idiosyncratic beliefs". To get to their numbers, the obviously biased researchers left out a few muslim killers on the basis that they weren't proven to be jihadists but included any killer who had even a passing association with the right eg one chap got into a fight over a domestic violence arrest, and killed two police. He was included because his wife said he was upset over Obama's election!!

Still the nuances don't matter. This number will become one of those memes endlessly repeated by the likes of Suse and the left commentariat without the slightest concern that its utterly bogus.