The Forum > General Discussion > So what's all the fuss about with the libs changing leaders
So what's all the fuss about with the libs changing leaders
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- ...
- 13
- 14
- 15
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Well explained - thanks for that.
I didn't catch Shorten last night but caught may tweets on twitter who were praising his performance. That might seem normal because I follow a lot of lefties, however, in my experience, the left have been very critical of Shorten on twitter - and last night it was sounding far more positive.
I believe Abbott was the perfect attack dog for the Coalition when it was in Opposition. He and Credlin demolished their disunited opponents. My criticism of him and them is about their mendacity in misleading the electorate on the policies they would introduce upon taking govt. It's one thing to roll the govt and entirely another to "comprehensively" lie your way into power.
Running such a tight ship in Opposition didn't translate to good govt for Credlin. She alienated most of the back bench and a fair chunk of cabinet....leaving nothing but Abbott's "captain's calls and his wooden debacle strewn agenda.
Rehctub,
"I'm always happy to admit when I'm wrong, the guy was a dud, he spent too much of his time worrying about minority groups with hidden agendas like the gay marriage brigade and spent too little time working on the big picture."
Yes, he was dud, but it wasn't because he spent time on minority groups - except to attempt to sideline their issues. It wasn't because he spent too little time working on the bigger picture - it's because he was a wrecker - and if a wrecker lies his way into office and is stymied in his agenda, then there's nothing to do but stagger around blindly repeating stale mantra's and waving flags.