Paul1405,

Do you deny that the Greens have always opposed the anti-gang legislation and specifically (as already stated), "It is the stated priority of the Greens and Labor to tear down the effective anti-gang laws in Queensland"?

Of course the lunar Greens are soft on the outlaw motorcycle gangs who manufacture and deal in drugs.

Blow as hard as you like, that is the Greens.

It is always interesting how you and the Greens deliberately and wrongly conflate the criminals' illegal possession and use of guns with the lawful, licensed, registered, approved ownership by the thousands of thoroughly reliable and honest citizens who meet the standards to qualify for a firearms licence.

Why you and the Greens do that would be the same reason the NSW 'Watermelon' Greens put up and maintain that 'registered gun' (Martin Place terrorist) lie on their website that is an unwarranted slur against the NSW police service.

The Greens are just a protest party. Anything for a headline.

As I suspected from you BEACHh a cowardly response. I put it to you in plain English, and I will put it again;

I challenge you to name any Green in New South Wales, in or out of Parliament who in your words is;

<<in favour of the outlaw motorcycle gangs who manufacture and traffic ice/Methylamphetamine, along with other very nasty criminal activities they are engaged in. Drug trafficking is responsible for almost all of the violent gang crime and involving guns, including gun running.>>

To assist your feeble mind here is a list of Greens members of the NSW Parliament;

JAMIE PARKER
JOHN KAYE
MEHREEN FARUQI
DAVID SHOEBRIDGE
JEREMY BUCKINGHAM
JENNY LEONG
TAMARA SMITH
JAN BARHAM
You can add LEE RHIANNON The Greens NSW Senator if you wish.

As I said BEACH put up or shut up! You made the statement now back it up, or show yourself to be the gutless poster you are. You claim on other threads "You know all about The Greens", so this should be simple for you to answer. Again put up or shut up!

Paul,

It was a simple question "What is Greens approved sports shooting?"
as in Policy 15.4

Please answer.

Perhaps the Greens' approved sports shooting includes feral cats like the one photographed in Tasmania

"A Tasmanian scientist has caught on camera a feral cat killing and eating a four-kilogram pademelon, providing the best direct evidence of feral cats killing mammals heavier than two kilograms."
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-30/scientists-catch-a-feral-cat-killing-a-large-mammal-on-camera-f/6357868

What say you, Paul?

Is Mise, I agree with that policy.

"15.4 Establish good and genuine reasons for possessing a licence (e.g. persons with an occupational requirement, e.g. primary producers, other rural purposes, security employees and professional shooters for nominated purposes or a member of an approved sports shooting association);"

For me an approved sports shooting association, and that is the name you choose for yourselves, are those engaged in shooting 'inanimate objects' not shooting yourselves, other people or animals, friendly or not so friendly. If you choose to make life size panda bears out of paper mache and shoot at them, that's your bag. You can even paint them in bright colors I have no objection. Its when you start wanting to shoot the real thing then I have a problem.

Feral, animals are a problem and need to be controlled, but I do not believe letting Rambo amateur shooters lose in the bush, is the answer. This was clearly demonstrated by a recent trial of amateurs shooting in national parks in NSW, it was a farce, an expensive farce. It would be like putting school children into our hospitals and expecting them to perform open heart sugary.

I did this topic a bit strange in terms of including topics like:

Politicians from most parties united in Canberra recently in a rare display of bipartisanship.....

The Parliamentary Friends..... in terms of something to do with killing and links to popular award-winning cookbook - sounds a bit tasteless doesn't it?

I'm now wondering in 2015 if we could have 'human' targeted shooting as a sport? Why are singling out other animal species? I mean a sport is a sport isn't it - if we go by the title "The friends of shooting."

Such a move would fit in fine with the Liberal Democrats, as they are pro-choice on everything and Labor, Liberal and the National parties hate each others guts.

Particularly with all of the people in starving third world countries, there has to be some sort of demand for this..... surely...... and we could start slowly. Shoot off someone's leg, then maybe a month later an arm, then maybe a foot..... we could start a new meat market.

Personally I would have thought these politicians would have more productive things to do with their time - but clearly not.

Finally to politicians out there, if you want to shoot - I'd rather you shoot yourselves in the foot at a press conference, during an interview or shoot yourselves to death in parliament (verbally) - but for me the best option is to serve a top class dinner in terms of policy and the people who elected you.

You'l be much more likely get accepted in next year's season of My Kitchen Rules or be on Annabel Crabb's ABC 'Kitchen Cabinet' program.