Christine Lagarde is head of the IMF.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYmViPTndxw&feature=youtu.be

Lagarde, "Today I'm going to test your numerology skills by asking you to think about the magic number 7.Most of you know that 7 is quite a number. I'm sure you can compress numbers as well.If we think about 2014,you drop the zero. 2X7=14"

Now note two important dates.Twin Towers 9/11/2001 Using Lagarde's numerology skills 9+1+1+2+1 = 14 or 2X7=14. London Bombings. 7/7/2005 7+7+2+5 = 21 or 3X7 = 21

What is the probability that these two dates fit perfectly into Christine Lagarde's numerology logic ? These evil elites like to telegraph their intent as it gives them the ultimate rush when it their crimes are enacted.

Agronomist, this quote from your first link.

"As for the cause of collapse of the adjacent 47 story building,"
"if no aircraft fuel is injected into the building it seems that there "may" have been a huge unstoppable gas leak in the foundation, and that a storage of diesel fuel in the building "may" have been ignited. This "may" have heated the floors near the ground for a long time. That "may" explain why this building collapsed like in a demolition."

Well that scribe certainly sounds confident, I will finish it off or him...June July August September...11.....

Not to mention the Aussie connection, our own Frank Lowie and his mate Larry Silverstein signed leases on WTC buildings six weeks before 9/11.........they cleaned up....the insurance companies had to pay them double indemnity because it was a “terrorist” attack.......

Regarding Bldg 7, watch this clip where Larry tells the NYFD to “pull it” then says, “we watched the building come down”..............he will later recount that he meant “pull the fire fighters and bystanders away from the building as in “pull them out”..........but he uses the generic term for building demolition.....inarticulate for a career property developer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p34XrI2Fm6I

The NYFD are in the wrong business given they can demolish a high rise into its own footprint with half an hour’s notice.

Agronomist, it stinks mate.

Neils Harritt didn't lead any investigation in the collapse of the building. What he did was supposedly test some dust obtained more than 6 years later from various truthers and confused paint chips for thermite material. His whole paper is a complete joke published in a joke journal that publishes anything you like as long as you pay them.

Agronimist well Niels Harritt was the spokesperson for them and there were from memory 9 scientists from many countries who presented a peer reviewed paper that has not been disproven. It is ignored for good reasons. See this cretin BBC reporter trying to pervert Harritt's logic. Harritt shoots him to pieces. Youtube is taking down many videos on 911.Why ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XF334x-xWz8

The third building came down on 9/11 because it was found to be unsafe, probably unsafe due to ground concussion caused by the falling twin towers, and so building 7 was immediately demolished to allow the rescues to continue.
http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/02/14/a-scientific-theory-of-the-wtc-7-collapse

JF the third building WTC 7 which no plane hit had minor fires in it. It was in good condition other than that. Larry Silverstein in his classic slip of the tongue said because of the damage we had to "pull it" and we watched the building come down.

"Pull it" is a demolition term used to remove the structural integrity of a building with explosives. Larry initially did not realise that it takes weeks to prepare building for demolition.He though it would take hours. So said he meant to pull the fireman out but they were out hours before.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p34XrI2Fm6I

It is totally unambiguous as to what Silverstein meant. I think a third plane was intended to hit WTC 7.It was probably the one that crashed in Shanksville.