Yvonne

“Jardine, I'm sure in your mind your comment is relevant.”

I used to think that feminism was about gender equality but now I recognise that it's simply factually historically incorrect that feminism is, or has ever been, about gender equality:
https://au.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20140630164746AApIVxY

You've just given a good example of the double standard. We're talking about marriage, sex and reproduction, and you tell us you support women's freedom this and women's freedom that, but when I talk about men's corresponding unfreedom, all of a sudden, that's not "relevant".

"Feminism is not a philosophy against the male gender."

“I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honourable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them.” – Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor
“To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he’s a machine, a walking dildo.” -– Valerie Solanas
“I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig.” — Andrea Dworkin
“Rape is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear” — Susan Brownmiller
“The more famous and powerful I get the more power I have to hurt men.” — Sharon Stone
“In a patriarchal society, all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent.” — Catherine MacKinnon

Lots more hate speech from leading feminist thinkers here:
http://www.womenagainstmen.com/media/feminism-is-a-hate-group.html

How do you explain them?

Perhaps you should consider re-thinking your views?

Good evening to you JARDINE K JARDINE...

You've certainly raised some interesting points upon which many adherents of Feminism must surely scrutinize ? Nonetheless, experiential evidence, together with simple logic will prove insufficient in which to prevail upon the common sense of most of those ardent supporters of feminism.

I suppose when one's passion is aroused, pragmatism, logic and undeniable evidence will prove patently inadequate, in which to permute the views and opinions of those who are intractably opposed to the natural role of the male species.

Feminist/progressives say they are for choice but hate happily married women who voluntarily submit to their husbands and make great mothers. The insecurity and hate of this is very evident among feminist. Funny enough I rarely meet a feminist who is not bitter and twisted and yet met multitudes of happily married woman who loves doing what comes natural.

Runner, exactly how old are you?
Were you born before 1930?

'...voluntarily submit to their husbands.'!
I am sure Noah said that to his wife in the Ark.

Anyone who feels the need to voluntarily submit to their partner must surely not enjoy the act.
In any case, once the productive years are over, surely there is no more need for sex?

Thank goodness for feminism ladies....

Were most of last Millenium's feminists angry lapsed Roman Catholics? It certainly seems that way.

Suseonline, you might be surprised at the meaning of that word and phrase outside of the highly structured Roman Catholic Church. Mystical, and layers of meaning - which should be suggested to you by other, essential descriptions of a married couple, for instance as 'one body', and why such words were carefully crafted at the time.

Christianity was liberating for women and outside of your very narrow 'old RC' understanding of it, still is. Chalk and cheese when compared with Islam which is worryingly well supported by feminists. Why is that? Is it your enemy is my enemy - cut off your nose to spite your face? Irrational, mad feminists, any wonder that young women run screaming from them.

What you display Susie is that deep down you admire controlling woman. Execept for the emasculated men very few like them despite your rhetoric.Plenty of evidence of that back in old testament times also Susie.