The Forum > General Discussion > The “moderate Muslim,” is there such a thing?
The “moderate Muslim,” is there such a thing?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 55
- 56
- 57
- Page 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
1. “Are you saying that Australians should also respect the Radicals right as well?
2. “Do you think that these people, as I have suggested to Ifitikhar, would find an Islamic Country much more suitable to their feeling & would be better off moving there?”
I can’t presume to suggest what Foxy’s answer would or should be, but here is mine:
1. Depends on what the copout term “Radicals” means. If it means those who reject the foundation of individual liberty which makes Australia and other Western and a few Asian countries worth living in, we should at the very least stiffen our requirements for entry and re-entry into Australia so that enemies of liberty are excluded whether they are called “radicals” or not.
2. Depending on their agenda the likes of Ifitikhar may find an Islamic Country much more suitable to their feeling & may be better off moving there. If though, as I believe it is, their agenda is jihad through an enclave in the West, then they would be thwarted in their life mission by making such a change. A more relevant question may be whether we the free people of the secular West would be better off without Ifitikhar’s ilk: the answer is yes of course. Bring it on.