The Forum > General Discussion > Rolf Harris
Rolf Harris
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 46
- 47
- 48
- Page 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- ...
- 121
- 122
- 123
-
- All
Posted by one under god, Wednesday, 16 July 2014 3:31:50 PM
| |
Michael Shrimpton also describes what he says happened to the abducted little girl Madeleine McCann, the assassination of Princess Diana, the murder of weapons expert Dr David Kelly who could have trashed the lies used to justify the Blair invasion of Iraq, and what he says was the murder of former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook.
I can’t confirm what he says about Madeleine or Cook but for sure I can with everything else with regard to Heath, Savile and the Conservative Party and government. Nor do I agree with all of his assumptions about who was behind it all, and certainly not that British Intelligence are the ‘good guys’. But it is very interesting information very much worth hearing. Click here to listen … http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNelt33QP_8 CAREFULL TRUTH AN MAKE US SICKER Posted by one under god, Wednesday, 16 July 2014 3:34:58 PM
| |
On this subject, I trust most of you have heard of the "Wicked Campers" uproar...
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-07-16/wicked-campers-apologises-for-controversial-van-slogan/5601622 ""Wicked Campers' owner, John Webb, wishes to acknowledge the prevailing community opinion by removing the slogan in question and making a commitment over the coming six months to changing slogans of an insensitive nature," the email states..." Although Tim Wilson seems to think it was just hunky-dory: "Earlier today, Human Rights Commissioner Tim Wilson defended the right of the company to use offensive slogans on its vans. Despite the success of the online campaign, Mr Wilson said people who disapproved should protest by not using the business. "Government shouldn't be going around telling people what they can and cannot say, unless it leads to direct and explicit harm," he said. "Just removing things that are offensive, while it may seem attractive, is a very dangerous precedent at least because people always have very different views about what is offensive and therefore should be limited." Posted by Poirot, Wednesday, 16 July 2014 6:12:45 PM
| |
Beach,
If it is deemed the sentence is manifestly inadequate, then the authorities should appeal. In fact the authorities have a duty to appeal. Naturally, you highlight that particular case because the perpetrators are aboriginal, something you will deny of course. To me I believe the colour of ones skin should have no bearing one way or the other. I also believe education is a useful tool to help prevent many of these crimes in the first place. Posted by Paul1405, Wednesday, 16 July 2014 6:23:13 PM
| |
onthebeach,
In Queensland, thanks to Beetie and Bligh we have a couple of clauses in all acts of parliament that relate to "ABORIGINAL DISENTANGLEMENT' and call on all 'decision makers' (and that includes judges), to take local and tribal culture into consideration when sentencing. This sort of behavior is the norm in Aurukun, I know because I lived there and policed there as well. Posted by chrisgaff1000, Wednesday, 16 July 2014 7:08:30 PM
| |
Paul1405,
That is right, indigenous girls should enjoy the full protection o Australian law like the mainstream population. All indigenous children should also have full access to the educational curriculum enjoyed by other children, that will equip them for modern life. What prevents all of that is not the lack of goodwill and good intentions by the mainstream population and certainly not the lack of taxpayer funding which is in the hundreds of millions every year. The reports of the federal government's own auditor, the Australian National Audit Office, have regularly confirmed over the years the misuse, corruption, fraud and wastage that have always been there and despite the simple and practical recommendations of the ANAO. Where a system is dysfunctional there are always those who somehow profit and are advantaged by that dysfunction and resist change. chrisgaff1000, Thank you. See my last sentence above. I'd say that there is little doubt that the electorate is very, very unhappy with the lack of accountability, expecially for the $billions of taxpayers' money that have been pumped into indigenous policy, initiatives and services over the years, and for precious little result. In fact the abuses of the trust of the public are increasing if anything. There are country towns that we now swerve around when travelling. Who wants to be called a white c... in the street by some drunken punks and have your vehicle broken into or vandalised while parked in a public street? Posted by onthebeach, Wednesday, 16 July 2014 10:06:28 PM
|
a short quote..from a long expose/thats going to hurt many of you fragile few/but its a time for truth/if only i had more article posts
http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/79139-the-british-establishment-paedophiles-everywhere/
The knock-on effect would be the same for much of the rest of the world because what I am about to describe is happening in every country to a larger or lesser extent – not least in the United States.
The revelations about record-breaking paedophile and child procurer Jimmy Savile have exposed the former BBC ‘star entertainer’ as a purveyor of sheer evil on a scale that would challenge any imagination. Here are the cold and shocking numbers according to the police – and these are not nearly the whole story:
450 people of both sexes have made complaints about Savile involving 28 police areas throughout the country and among them are 34 alleged rapes. They spanned a period of 54 years between 1955 and 2009 when Savile was 82. The abuses happened to 23 children and young people on BBC premises and at 14 hospitals and at least one hospice. More than 70 per cent of his victims were under 18 and one as young as eight.
Metropolitan Police Commander Peter Spindler said that Savile’s crimes were ‘vast, predatory and opportunistic’ and he had effectively ‘groomed the nation.’ Sounds good, but personally, I would not trust the Met’s investigation Operation Yewtree to pursue the full truth about Savile any more than I would have trusted him to produce the school nativity.
Spindler added – ludicrously – that Savile used his celebrity to ‘hide in plain sight’. Oh, no, no, no, mate. That will not do. Savile got away with it for 54 years because he was protected by the highest levels of the paedophile-Satanist-controlled British Establishment for whom he was procuring children.