'I certainly wouldn't denigrate a whole section of society by saying they condone things like baby killing or accuse them of promoting deaths at sea. I would, however, stridently criticise a govt which enacted policy with which I disagree. '

really saint Poirot? Your abbottphobia has bordered on hysteria.

Runner "claims" innocence. So, let's forensically examine Runner's first post on this subject within this thread, to determine his guilt or innocence:

(1) On page 7 I first brought up Catholicism pedophilia, pointing out that some people have remained silent on the issue. In his reply on page 8, Runner then defended Catholicism pedophilia by saying not ONE WORD of criticism about this church pedophilia, and then "pointing" in order to deflect my criticism of Catholicism pedophilia. Runner started "pointing" by saying that pedophilia was not reported by "luwies" within the ABC and BBC about "some of their own". Runner then began "pointing" at the "left" saying that they don't agree with each other that pedophilia is wrong. Runner then "pointed" at people who think child porn is art. Runner then "pointed" at me asking where I got my morals from. Runner was doing ALL he could in the reply to *NOT* criticize Catholicism or Christianity and "their" pedophiles and handling of the matters. His main intent was to "point", in order to defend Christianity. In his reply he was not the least bit interested in expressing any concern whatsoever for the victims. He was *ONLY* interested in deflecting criticism away from "Christianity" pedophilia. He was "defending" the church, by "pointing".

MY POINT PROVEN. Case closed.

"really saint Poirot? Your abbottphobia has bordered on hysteria."

I reserve the right on this forum to criticise the govt and its leader...especially when it's being seen to have lied its way so comprehensively into govt.

What I don't do on this forum, runner, is to consistently paste fellow posters with whom I disagree as haters and immoral people simply because they disagree with me.

I don't accuse fellow posters of condoning baby killing or drowning deaths at sea.

I don't antagonistically accuse the "righties" on this forum en block of things such as these:

"...all about self interest for the left rarely if ever about principle."

"And again, the Left is dead silent .......The left and Islam have much in common"

" At least you are admitting that pedophilla is wrong something that not all the left agree on."

"in case you are blinded like many other lefties..."

"Then again life is cheap among lefties who condone baby murder."

"u r a typical leftist revisionist who knows only moral relativism."

"you Nhoj and Poirot show how bereft and deceitful atheism is."

"yea I would expect you Paul to encourage Poirot and Nho to keep up their lies and slurs."

(and all of that from just this one thread..your slurs on fellow posters over the years could fill a book)

So I'll criticise Abbott & his govt if I so wish....and while you wave around your abusive attributions toward fellow posters in the guise of Christian morality, I'll criticise that too.

@Poirot,

Total hogwash!

You were hysterically ranting about the Abbott govt even before it was sworn-in -–and you haven’t stopped since.

And as for “ I don't accuse fellow posters of condoning baby killing or drowning deaths at sea.” --Bullstwang!

Remember your old line about the US being responsible for every baby that died in Iraq duruing the UN sanctions.

And your second favourite line (or was that the one you lifted from Namoi Klien?) is that the West --through the Green Revolution (which was, any, only one giant conspiracy to rob the poor) was responsbe for the suicide of thosands of Indian farmers.


And then we have you running mate obNHOJious!
The only forensic examination he’d have experience in would be on his own sphincter ani externus

The left -–as it is in much of the West today -- is corrupt and cowardly and you and Nhoj are prime personifications of it.

Ahhh, another personally abusive post from SPQR. Cool.

SPQR,

What a load of waffle.

You appear to be equating the debate on various issues and public personalities (which is what we do on OLO) with the low act of stooping to impugn your opponent in lieu of argument.

Your quote from me:

"And as for “ I don't accuse fellow posters of condoning baby killing or drowning deaths at sea.” --Bullstwang! "

Followed by:

"Remember your old line about the US being responsible for every baby that died in Iraq duruing the UN sanctions."

Erm...how does criticising the "US" stack up to abusing a "fellow poster"?

For that matter, how does criticising Tony Abbott equate to abusing fellow posters because they don't hold similar philosophies?

As for:

"The left -–as it is in much of the West today -- is corrupt and cowardly and you and Nhoj are prime personifications of it."

Typical - and no wonder you step forward to defend runner and his charming habit of abusing OLOer's who disagree with him - you're exactly the same.

The most amusing aspect being is that those who have no recourse but to abuse those they're debating - obviously lack the capacity to argue issues on their merits.