Poirot

as usual you are extremely selective in your reading and comprehending. You defend

'Runner is a typical immoral Catholic who "excuses" the rife pedophilia in Catholicism by pointing '

no evidence and factually wrong and yet something u insist on from others. What upsets you is that your common hypocrisy is clearly on display. You lose the arguement and spit the dummy.

runner,

Show me evidence where I have defended the following:

"Runner is a typical immoral Catholic who "excuses" the rife pedophilia in Catholicism by pointing"

I haven't accused you of anything "except" coming onto this forum and serially attributing heinous vices to anyone who holds a differing philosophy from yourself.

I stand by that.

When I read things like this:

"....Then again life is cheap among lefties who condone baby murder...."

I find it represents exactly your ongoing style. You serially accuse fellow posters, of hate, filth, immorality - condoning baby murder!" -, etc...simply because they hold differing opinions to yourself.

That's no way to debate, all it does is raise the ire of your opponents.

Wrong runner, you lie. There's PLENTY of evidence that you are not a "real" Christian, and that you excuse Christianity pedophilia by pointing.

I have proved the "pointing" allegation time and time again on this thread. Come on Runner .... MAN UP, admit it, then reform your behaviour by becoming a "real" Christian.

And you have proved that you are not a "real" Christian by the abusive content of your posts over the years towards those who don't agree with "your" opinions.

Runner, get some "real" religious counseling for yourself, stop defending the church against people who attack it's history of wicked pedophilia. Runner, place the victims first and the church last .... instead of the other way round.

Be a man, be a "real" Christian for once.

When a child has been sexually abused, the child's welfare *MUST ALWAYS* be placed *FIRST and FOREMOST*. No ifs, no buts, no exceptions, no defending the church.

ok Poirot your style is hate rant posts against budget cuts has ( all Abbott really) and I use graphic language to describe what I hate (the murder of the unborn).

The words 'filth'was used to describe Nhoj 's narrative which suggested that I was in favour of covering up child abuse by priests. You know that is a disgusting untrue slur which I have never suggested. What I suggested was that all organisations be held to the same scrunity. The so called police whistle blower that the ABC rounded up has proven to be a fraud. I have and never will defend the Catholic church but I will defend truth something you use extremly loosely.

Nhoj

I suggest you do some reading and get a little understanding before continuing with your vile worthless rants.

Parrot,

I apologise for raising issues to do with the oppression of women in other countries, and black as well. I'll try not to bring such irrelevant topics up in future :)

Joe
www.firstsources.info

runner,

"....but I will defend truth something you use extremely loosely.'

There you go again, when am I loose with the truth?

I have an opinion, and I state it liberally.

Regarding your run-in with nhoj...it seems you were both going pretty hard at it.

For my part, I was commenting mainly about your earlier post in this thread and your history of blanket denigration of people whom you label "lefties"...like myself , for instance.

I certainly wouldn't denigrate a whole section of society by saying they condone things like baby killing or accuse them of promoting deaths at sea. I would, however, stridently criticise a govt which enacted policy with which I disagree.

I'm constantly amazed at how you promote your faith. We had our two good friends over for tea last night. Both elderly church attending Catholics...and a more caring and considerate couple you would never meet (who vote Liberal!).
I can't imagine them denigrating others in the fashion you do, merely for holding opposing political or philosophical/religious outlooks.