Jayb,

"It's strange, but poirot usually defends these practices by her Islamic friends."

Aside from Loudmouth deviating the domestic issue of SM's thread to his favourite "leftie donging weapon"...he at least keeps things relatively civil.

Show us your evidence, Jayb?

I mean - show us?

You've got eight posts a day on the general forum to repost my supposed defences of Islamic atrocities to women.

You won't do it because they don't exist - and you're one vacuous little man who mendaciously misrepresents your fellow poster whenever the opportunity arises.

It's easy to lie - and then scuttle out the door.

Most of us choose not to....

Lester1,

You're a clever little vegemite...yes, I meant to write "Cabinet" - not Parliament.

But I think the rest of the gentlemen here realised that.

Btw...the term "feminnazi" is a tad stale these days. Had its run, I'd say.

Therefore, it's not surprising that you would choose to use it.

Jeepers, no wonder there are hardly any women posting here these days, with up and coming talent like yours...nothing to see here folks!

poirot: my supposed defences of Islamic atrocities to women.

All your previous posts concerning atrocities committed in the defence of Islamic Sharia Law. Not specifically women.

poirot: you're one vacuous little man who mendaciously misrepresents your fellow poster whenever the opportunity arises.

No. I just like to keep some people honest. Also, when questioned on specifics like this your usual tactic is to deflect the question.

Jayb v. P'rot [re: condoning Islams oppressive acts]

Recently I had need to complete a series of those progressively inspired harassment, bullying, discrimination tests/refreshers that nowadays most employees are subjected to --talk about 1984ish!

Anyway, unless I am mistaken I seem to recall that one of the underlying principles was that if-–not just an employer ---but even a humble employee observed any of the above and did not report it/try to stop it they might be guilty of being seen to condone it.

By extension of that noble and very very lefty-progressiveand tenet, it might be argued (as Jayb has) that practically all lefties on this forum carry a burden of guilt re the Malala Yusufza case & similar.

Particularly those otherwise very vocal & self-righteous lefties like Poirot and Steelredux

And as an impartial/disinterested observer I find Jayb's case/charge very convincing!
............................

Hey Poroit, while I’m here –you may have forgotten-- but you promised to give me you twitter handle?

Jayb,

"All your previous posts concerning atrocities committed in the defence of Islamic Sharia Law. Not specifically women."

Okay...cough 'em up?

Talking of specifics...show us the posts where I defend "any" Islamic atrocities?

That's not difficult if they exist, surely.

Your problem is that they don't exist and you are being dishonest in your accusations.

Show us...

"No. I just like to keep some people honest. Also, when questioned on specifics like this your usual tactic is to deflect the question."

I'm not deviating here...I'm calling you out on your dishonesty.

Come on...produce the goods.

SPQR,

I won't address the body of your last post as, for the most part, it appears to be mangled waffle.

However, regarding "Hey Poroit, while I’m here –you may have forgotten-- but you promised to give me you twitter handle?"

You guys can't get it right, can you.

You said this to me:

"Hey Poirot, just on another issue. I remember you told us you were going into Twitter bigtime. Would you care to tell us your twitter handle?"

I replied:

"I'm tempted to give you my twitter handle, but I think I won't...although I did give a hint here once.

Maybe you can work it out for yourselves : )"

How is that "promising" to give you my twitter handle?