Male or female if they get violent shoot them on sight. They soon shoot the mentally ill don't they so surely these people are sociopaths of the highest order and there is no place for them among ordinary people.

CG if you are not just pulling our leg then you best fit your description above.
LAW and the way we enforce it is in my view often wrong.
We should consider if we in fact harm offenders by time and again letting them go free.
I do not want a harsher system.
But I do want a better one, short sentences used to educate and even work can out kids back on track.

A day is coming that see,s a review of welfare, so a job is first step in a new life for many.
I remain deeply concerned that PC driven Greens/pink left followers highlight the actions of the ticket inspectors but ignore her punch and the fact this girl did not have a ticket.

I do not want a harsher system.
Belly,
then you are part of the problem!

Belly, "I remain deeply concerned that PC driven Greens/pink left followers highlight the actions of the ticket inspectors but ignore her punch and the fact this girl did not have a ticket."

Responsible people would agree with you.

Your earlier questions remain unanswered by Greens/Left, one being what should you do if similarly abused, spat upon and physically assaulted?

To tackle that question, whereas no-one can ever remove your right to defend yourself, as one man to another I have to advise you of the obvious though, that you are strongly advised to cross your arms in front of you for protection while shouting, "Stop hurting/attacking/hitting me". Where she has a weapon you must get the hell out of there wherever possible. Men are prevented from defending themselves by the certainty that the women will benefit from a positive stereotype and the police, eventually the court, will be on their side every time.

Where the attacker is by a women familiar to you and especially your wife or partner, it is a lay-down misere that you will find that her story is always preferred to yours. So get that phone camera working or do what some police do, wear a watch that will record voice (you can tell the time from your mobile anyhow). It is a worthwhile accessory for recording consent to sex as well. Not such a bad idea when you consider the risks.

In our feminist dominated political environment, you must expect the media and the law to excuse her anyway, even if literally speaking the smoking gun was in her hand.

On the other hand, where your wife has sunk the carving knife to the Sheffield maker's name in your ribs, it is better to be judged by twelve men and womyn and risk injustice, than to be carried by six men good and true.

OTB,

I had a related thought the other afternoon. I was out doing my regular evening jog when I saw across the road a teenage girl with two huge dogs, they were without muzzles or restraints of any kind. I thought, now what would happen if one/both of those dogs suddenly attacked me (or another male).Of course we could call the police, but just supposing we did and she --wanting to protect her dogs-- said the dogs acted in response to my having attacked/harassed of her.

I reckon(ed) I'd be the one who'd end in the compound for the night.

Belly and others,

It is perfectly reasonable to rail against the advice I gave not to be construed as reacting with any force when attacked by one or more women, and,

where the assailant is a wife or female acquaintance to put your hands in your pockets or cross arms in front over chest, risking some injury rather than face the prospect of serious charges and loss of reputation that could destroy your job and future.

If is unfair, but it is reality. Read the papers.

Do wrap something around your arms and forearms if at all possible, every time. You will not see a knife or glass until too late to do much but wear it and women assailants prefer weapons. Better to get outside fast every time, while continually yelling stop and stop hurting me. It may not be manly or chivalrous and men see themselves as the protectors of women, but your body and future are on the line make no mistake about that!

You DO need to yell, it gives some prospect of defence against her story that it was actually you attacking her. In any event you will be wearing handcuffs, visiting a cell and be the subject of long interrogation anyhow, while the woman is sympathetically counselled and offered asylum from the nasty male, so your story without the evidence of others hearing your screams will bear little weight.

Why men don't give women like that the swerve God only knows. Mind you, the ticket inspector is still copping hate mail and sledging at a political level, despite an internal review. A woman ticket inspector who was required to restrain an offender wouldn't have even been reviewed one would imagine.