The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > lets NOT..talk..of depleted uranium..

lets NOT..talk..of depleted uranium..

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. Page 7
  9. 8
  10. All
otb,

I never said that Australia should rely on the UN.
However, in a world where all nations face a common
threat of direct or indirect involvement in
nuclear warfare, some reliable method is needed to
limit conflict among sovereign states. Firstly, the United
Nations does provide a forum for world opinion and a
mechanism for conflict resolution. Secondly there is a
growing body of international law that specifies
the rights and obligations that nations have toward one
another - particularly with respect to aggression.

But, as has already been stated a major difficulty with
international peace-making, of course, is that compliance
with the resolutions of the United Nations and the rulings
of its World Court are voluntary because no country is
willing to surrender its sovereignty to an international
body. The United Nations is most efective, in fact, when
superpowers are able to agree on a course of action and
mobilize their blocs to support it.

Even so, the organisation provides an influential forum
for world opinion, and, while it does not always prevent
war, it surely helps make it less likely.

We have to remember that an important element in any peace
process is the international community and its mechanisms
for restraining conflict among its members. Trade,
travel, and telecommunications have made the nations of
the modern world more interdependent than ever before.
Posted by Foxy, Sunday, 17 November 2013 9:34:15 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
it seems we are..entertaining..concepts..[ideas]
so..todays edit..includes the power..of shared ideas
and why we seem so driven..to get others to share our own..ideas

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=6040#176278

you must remember..someone..FIRST*..*gave you.your ideas.
then you gave them..life..[powers overr your living/thought/works

but how trust-worthy..was the source..?
if the source..has..expressed lie/fear..only fear can come out
Posted by one under god, Sunday, 17 November 2013 11:01:54 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
edited extract

*His Mind
is..partly..YOURS..and also..*PARTLY..GOD’S.

This..needs clarification/not*..merely..in re-statement,
since..what..we have said..that..this before,..is..but..that wrought..by..life-EXPERIENCE...of..the conception..of a higher idea*

The..Holy-Spirit..is..simply..a will..[as you will]
calling..for..the *IDEA..[of healing...by..Being]..of thought,
of..*the..life..of..*the...idea..as it GAINS..ever more..living power..AS IT..*IS..SHARED.

by...Being..the call..FOR that..GOOD..of..God,
it..is also..the idea..OF God's good..fair/just..rewards.

*you are..ape-part..of God,..it is*also..the idea..your will envisions..of..the embodied-being/of..YOURSELF..being,..appart..as much a a part..as well..as of*..all the parts..of Good.[god]

The idea..of..the Holy Spirit/shares..the property[proper-ties]..properties....[pro-portions]..of other ideas,..because it follows*..upon..beyond..the laws..even..of the universe..of which IT
is..a part.[ape-heart]

Therefore,..it is strengthened*..by being..given*away.
It increases..in YOU..as you/give it..to your brothers.[for/free]

Since..thoughts*..*do not..have to be..*conscious..to exist,
your brother..does not..evem..have to/be AWARE..of/the Holy Spirit,[..either in himself..or in you]..for this..miracle..to occur.

He may/have..dissociated..the call/for Good,
just/as..YOU have...But the..dissociation..[misscreation].is healed in
BOTH/of..you..*as you*see_it*..in him,..and thus..acknowledge..its BEING.

Bill,..who/has..made..a number..of vital/contributions..to our
joint-venture,..made a..major-one..a while ago,..one..by..which
he..himself..did/not..notice/appreciate..or even understand.

If..*we recognize..its value together,..we/will..will to/be..en-able to..use it..together,..*because it is*..an idea,..and..*must therefore..be shared..to be/held...respected/reverently/reflectively/activly..used*.

When/Bill..said that..he..*was determined*
“NOT to see..you..that way,”..[he was speaking/negatively.]

If..he will..but..re-state..the same idea,,but..POSITIVELY,
as affirmation..he will..see the POWER..of what he/said.

He..*had realized.that there..*are..*two_ways..of seeing
you,..and..also that..*they..so seeing..are/diametrically..opposed to one/an-other.

These two ways..must be*..miss-realized..in HIS mind,..because he
was*..referring/to..HIMSELF..as/the..*per-ceiver.
They..*must also..be in YOURS,.because..what,..he was/perceiving..was YOU.

What..he was..*really saying..was..that/he
would*NOT..look at you..*through HIS ego,..nor..perceive*YOUR ego..in you.

Stated positively,..that..he would*..[will/to[..see you
through*..the Holy/Spirit..*in..HIS mind,..and perceive..*it..in YOURS.

What you acknowledge..in..your brother,..*you ARE
acknowledging.,.*in yourself...What you share *..you STRENGTHEN.

The voice..of..the Holy/Spirit..IS weakly..willed..in you..yet.
That..is why..you MUST*..share it,..*because..*it must be..INCREASED in/strength..*before YOU..can..will..to/hear it.

It is impossible..to hear it..in yourself..while it..is
indeterminate..[unfocused/unfiltered]..so weak..yet..in your OWN mind.

It is..*NOT weak..in itself;..but it IS..
limited/by..your..very/un-willingness to/hear it.

Will itself..is an idea,..and is therefore..only..strengthened by being shared...You have made/the mistake..of looking..*for the Holy Spirit..ONLY..*in YOURSELVES,..and that/is why..your meditations
have/frightened..you.

By..adopting..the ego’s..viewpoint,
you undertook..an..ego-alien..journey..of ,mal-creations..but fear not..

only your..own fears..keeps them..alive.
[recall..ye/not..ye..shalt..NOT*..FEAR..no*evil*].
Posted by one under god, Sunday, 17 November 2013 11:43:44 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Funny how - to some dedicated apologists - anything that challenges the morality of the sacred and holy work of the conservative forces of politics is seen as a conspiratorial ranting yet the feeblest of arguments against the alternative is leapt upon like "buzzards on a gut-wagon".

No amount of evidence will ever be enough to change their view of the world.

However there is always the slimmest of possibilities that both sides do some things right and also some things wrong.

It's more likely than one side always being wrong and the other always being perfectly right.

By the way, Depleted Uranium also does some very nasty things when it gets in contact with water, even in it's inert state - especially groundwater. Abandoned military bases leave behind incredible amounts of environmental pollution.

Asbestos also took a while to display problems in the community yet those interested and knowledgeable parties still kept producing the stuff.

So what's changed?
Posted by rache, Sunday, 17 November 2013 9:44:02 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Foxy,

I have already given the example of West Papua. That and many more you ignore.

You might also consider this current article on the UN Human Rights Council,

<UN rights council welcomes strange bedfellows to the table
November 17, 2013

Human rights violators cannot uphold basic rights.
..
You would think the UN would know something about the world's nations. After all, it's sort of the reason for its existence. It may seem to bear the curse of Sisyphus, trying to create a better place in an imperfect world, but it is the planetary forum of civilisation.

And then along comes this: a few days ago, the UN General Assembly voted 14 new members on to its Human Rights Council. Among the 14 were China, Russia and Saudi Arabia. Let me repeat those names: China, Russia and Saudi Arabia.
..
Does anyone seriously expect violators of human rights to uphold the sanctity of human rights? It's a travesty and a farce>
http://www.theage.com.au/comment/un-rights-council-welcomes-strange-bedfellows-to-the-table-20131116-2xnqu.html

So much for the Greens lunar belief in the UN for its 'One World Government', with Bob Brown as the self-appointed first President.
Posted by onthebeach, Sunday, 17 November 2013 11:25:54 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Beach,
I understand your point. As these member states of the UN were elected to the Human Rights Council by the 193 members of the General Assembly, few if any of them can claim never to have violated human rights, how would YOU prevent their election in the first place. If membership of this council was restricted to only the "sinless" it could prove to be a very lonely council to be on, with the bloke from Tuvalu sitting there all alone, writing a very strongly worded proclamation on human rights violations in China, Russia and Saudi Arabia.
Posted by Paul1405, Monday, 18 November 2013 6:50:20 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. Page 7
  9. 8
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy