Thank you Josephus,

I'll take your advice regarding one (what) under god on board.

Is Mise "The trouble is not the ethnicity of the people but the religion of Islam and I couldn't care less about the colour of a persons skin"

But ethnicity/race is associated with Islam.
As I already said (echo, echo, echo) very few Whites are Muslim and very few Muslims are White.

How exactly are you going to determine if an visa applicant is "Muslim"?
They can lie.

Since I don't believe in banning religions or any other ideas/beliefs/concepts, a racial restriction would accomplish much the same results (almost no Muslim immigration).

It would also eliminate the possibility of *our* people being incrementally extinguished, replaced by something unrecognisable as "Australian" or even "European/Western".

Our people (the ethnic group "Australians") have as much right to exist and perpetuate themselves as any other people.

We can't do that when immigration is the reason for most population growth, and 3 out of 4 of those immigrants are vastly dissimilar to us, morphologically and culturally.

"The trouble with using the term 'white' is that everyone does know what is really meant."

And what is that?
That anyone using the term is one of Hitler's true believers?
What of your "wild assumptions" about me, presuming I'm an extremist wanting to revive that nutter's nonsense.
Why are you making such a big deal about the terminology?

If a dark skinned man said his identity was "Black" would you starting ranting about how inaccurate that term is, or would you just accept his self-definition?

You are horrified by "racism", but defend cross-breeding our people into extinction, using historical atrocities like slavery, invasion, colonisation and piracy to justify yourself!

And then think you're morally superior to me! Unbelievable!

Shockadelic,

If you are going to use a racist term then you'll get lumped in with the racists; tough.

dan/<<Why disseminate lies about Jews?>>

you refuted..nothing
what were lies?

your going by righteous indignation
lets stick with the facts

are/you zionist or due?
you atheist..or religious
do you take sabbath?..live by mens law..or gods

is god real to you..or just a convenient detraction/stick

why pretend..only jews..are/gods chosen?
only/jews/know god?

why pretend..you follow the bible
[when/too many..of your mates live by the talmud]

why pretend god gave atheists..anything
men took it..[god didnt give it]
what land isnt gods land

mass psychosis..is sad..its..just sad

<<..Jews do not believe..that Jesus was/is god,>>

neither do..i

<<If a number of Jews do not like Christians, this is quite understandable given the history of Christian hatred of Jews,>>

plus visa/versa..its genetic..[sic*]..just/inbreeding?

[i dont hate..you..i..detest
your deliberate/obstinate/biased-ignorance;s]

poor jew..as if thats the only genoocide
holocaust survivors refute holocausts

its rather obvious..that..natzi/zionist/asthiest's
hollow-costed..the religious-jew..then
said jesus mob dun*it

[why the lies allround?]

<<and pogroms, culminating in the Holocaust.>>

OH DEAR..i..KNEW YOU WOULD TRY THE JOKER CARD
WHY..NOT ANTI-SEMITE?..[or jew-hater][i only/hate zionists]

<<You appear to be on the same trajectory.>>

i dont want..YOUR armogeddon
get that..?

your leaders are ill/sick..[god hasnt made them insane/fools have

]
its you religious nutters wanting a secular state[gifted youof god]

no god wants blood sacrifice[but faulse man-gods/do]

its clear..your conflicted
[god is one]..but zionists run-in herds

<<Your hatred is palpable.>>

your masters..collude mass*genocide..of all goy
[then allthe god/nutters]

sure you dont..
but..those..you defend do

<<As for your references,..these are from David Duke,>>

never heard of/the zionist shill
[your mates play both-sides against the middle]

any real..opponant gets killed[at least you know each other]

<<..You couldn't find a more vile creature to cite.>>..

i dont judge people..i judge what they say

you refuted/said..exactly..nuthing..of what was said
and as for your ignorant mate..he clearly reads..less

THE TALMUD..is an accursed satanic text

http://www.biblestudysite.com/factsarefacts.htm
quotations;from the Soncino Edition of the Talmud,(Book)

that actually says things like found hereunder
[presumably..AS I HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO FIND THIS BOOK I can only believe what i see written[hereunder]

YEBAMOTH,60b...Rabbi.Ramanos who conducted an inquiry..and..'found'.. in it..the daughter of a..'proselyte'..who was under the age of three years and one day...,and Rabbi*declared her..eligible to live with a priest."

(footnotes)"..A proselyte..under the age of three years
and one day..may be married*

by a priest...And was married..to a priest.
(i.e.,permitted to continue to live with her'husband'."]

(Book)

SANHEDRIN,..55b-55a:.."What is meant by this?...

Rab said:..Pederasty..with a child below nine years
of age..is not deemed...as pederasty with a child above that.

(footnotes)"..The reference is to..the
passive..'subject'/victim..of sodomy

i have mentioned this at 3 other posted topic
[and no one has yet been able to present the complete book[on the web]via a link...

from what i read about it so far
encourages me not to spend a..second..of/my life
actually baying..[let alone..oh-baying..re..this demonic/Slavic/Bolshevik/zionist/text..talmud..is corrupted.

that reportedly/guides..rabbies of certain abrahamic/beliefs..
i understand that the so called settlers in palistein..use the book as their authority..[to do unspeakable things..in hidden places]...

thus your being able to present the full text online...may allow me to either confirm or deney...

its noticeable that few..that critique my quote..
have read the text..or the tall-mmud

HAVE YOU?...read..either

maybe..not ALL..TALMUDS
BUT WHO..KNOWS[YOU..CLEARLY KNOW LESS EVEN/THAN ME]

I..NOTED..AN EARLIER REBUTTAL

<<Passages censored in previous editions of the Talmud were restored, and the translators amplified the text with extensive footnotes that form a running commentary.

The publication was completed as a 35-volume set in 1952,
and republished in..18 volumes in 1961.>>

SEEMS THE BOOKS..HAVE BEEN CLEANED UP
OR DIRTIED/DOWN..WHO KNOWS

YOU SURE DONT
ITS SAD YOUR..OWN/IGNORANCE..HAS MADE YOU SO DEFENSIVE
[OR MAYBE..YOU COULD REFUTE FACTS WITH FACT..NOT OPINION]

so tell me..is it ok to ..make love
to a child under 3 yeaRS..[AND ONE DAY]'S..BUM?

THATS YOUR GOD?

OH DEAR LORD
MAKE THE EVIL/ONES..GO AWAY.