The Forum > General Discussion > Do we ban the religion, or just wait for the inevitable to happen here.
Do we ban the religion, or just wait for the inevitable to happen here.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Page 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- ...
- 67
- 68
- 69
-
- All
Posted by Foxy, Saturday, 30 November 2013 6:00:54 PM
| |
Hitler sent "scientists" to prove the Japanese were Aryans, and they promptly did. Those blokes knew what side their bread was buttered.
Posted by Paul1405, Saturday, 30 November 2013 6:05:11 PM
| |
belly/quote..<<..Do not tell me..of the crusades..but what Christian would kill..for his God..and expect reward..for such an evil thing?>>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_antisemitism The Crusades were a series of several military campaigns sanctioned by the Papacy that took place during the 11th through 13th centuries. They began as Christian endeavors to recapture Jerusalem and then to maintain the small Christian kingdoms established in the Levant against the Muslim reconquest which eventually overran them. The mobs accompanying the first Crusade, and particularly the People's Crusade, attacked the Jewish communities in Germany, France, and England, and put many Jews to death. Entire communities, like those of Treves, Speyer, Worms, Mainz, and Cologne, were slain during the first Crusade by a mob army. About 12,000 Jews are said to have perished in the Rhenish cities alone between May and July, 1096 <<..Would they MURDER if no God existed ..and they knew it?>> MILLIONS http://www.google.com.au/search?q=atheist+death+communism& Posted by one under god, Saturday, 30 November 2013 6:15:29 PM
| |
"Now yes not all Muslims are like that" writes Belly of the two subhumans who butchered the soldier in London.
The Koran is. Its wording is structured to pretend it isn't. Exactly how it's done is set out in words that even a Western apologist could comprehend if his or her mind wasn't lulled by the sugar coating. See through the taqiyya at http://www.meforum.org/2538/taqiyya-islam-rules-of-war Especially note the section "Taqiyya in Qur'anic Revelation" but preferably in the context of the quite short article. Posted by EmperorJulian, Saturday, 30 November 2013 6:39:40 PM
| |
The Nazi's seen the ideal German male as a tall, blond haired, blue eyed Nordic type. Then you take one look at Hitler, Goebbels, Himmler and Goering. Did something get lost in the translation?
Nothing to do with Nazi's, well at least I don't think it has. On our way out to see an Island band, enjoy a bit of multiculturalism, old school, seen one last night Fijian reggae, "Te" likes Island bands, here daughter-in-laws plays in one, I like them too, all the bros will be there, plenty of respect for "Aunty and Uncle" get a real mix of people who all enjoy the night, with good music and a couple of beers. Multiculturalism at its best. Posted by Paul1405, Saturday, 30 November 2013 6:41:26 PM
| |
Is Mise "Where do you get your weird guesstimates from?"
What guesstimates are they? "What I have objected to is your use of 'white' merely pointing out that it is erroneous as a description of Europeans." And you do so by "merely" justifying your "enlightened" opinion by reference to the most vicious, destructive events in history (slavery, invasions, colonisation, piracy), just because those atrocities caused a "very low level" of cross-breeding (mostly by rape!). You are the most absurd anti-racist I've ever encountered! You use the most unethical acts to justify what you think is ethical. (Head explodes). But you're actually ironically consistent, since the incremental genocide of ALL WHITE PEOPLE will be noted by future historians as the most evil event in history. Evil justifying evil. That's what you are, not "enlightened". "Even that arch white supremacist, Adolph Hitler, considered Indians to be Aryan people and thus 'white'" "Aryan is in fact a linguistic grouping." Make up your mind. Is "Aryan" racial or cultural? "White" is not a "linguistic" category. He's not my "master". Couldn't care less what he thought. So "White" means Aryan? Then why didn't he just use the term "White"? That term was more common both then and now. "Aryan" and "White" are not synonyms. Indic people (and Iranians) are related to Europeans, as I said earlier. But the connection was severed *thousands* of years ago, with each developing different cultures/civilisations and biological morphology. They're hardly part of the same continuum anymore. It doesn't matter whether the term "White" is 100% accurate. It's a term commonly used and understood. "Black" people aren't completely black. Their palms and soles are light-skinned. And many (especially in America) now have a "very low level" (average 30%!) of White DNA. But everyone knows what "Black" means. Posted by Shockadelic, Saturday, 30 November 2013 10:19:11 PM
|
I know. I wasn't referring to what you said
but what Hitler said. And Aryan is from the Sanskrit -
arya in origin