The Forum > General Discussion > New Marriage laws for the ACT
New Marriage laws for the ACT
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Page 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- ...
- 35
- 36
- 37
-
- All
Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 27 October 2013 8:44:41 AM
| |
Paul,
Of course there were homosexuals in the army; I've had them in some of my platoons but provided that they kept their proclivities to themselves they were tolerated, they were judged as soldiers not on their sexual preferences. There were homosexual men in the services who showed great bravery and one who is well documented was Nancy Wake's wireless operator; she always spoke very highly of him, both as a wireless-op and a soldier. Latex condoms will stretch to a fantastic size, in an experiment we tied one to a hose and with the water flowing in slowly the thing expanded to about a metre and a half in length and half a metre wide before it burst. Good results are also achieved on car exhaust pipes but not near as big. Posted by Is Mise, Sunday, 27 October 2013 9:16:41 AM
| |
Paul I would say that the Army issued Condoms as they believed that if given half a chance troops would fraternise with local women.
On the Beach, The spread of AIDS to heterosexual women is the same way that it is for Homosexuals, through bodily fluids and sexual intercourse. It is thought to originated in Africa, a country that is well known for rape or both sexes as well as bad practices of health care. In fact immunisation for Polio with unclean needles in Africa is thought to have strongly contributed to the spread of HIV. Worldwide the majority of cases transferred sexually are through heterosexual contact, however in first world country's there is a greater risk from anal sex, especially for homosexual men, but it is thought to be a result of a lesser use of protection, not the way the act is preformed. It is also thought that people who preform unsafe anal sex are less likely to tell their doctor about it and therefore are not tested as regularly and this "secrecy" is because of social discrimination. Posted by Bec_young mum of 2, Sunday, 27 October 2013 9:50:06 AM
| |
Because this can be a convoluted process, Poirot...
"I know it can be hard but in this case you need to do what Jesus would do and turn the other cheek." I've linked to one, possibly, relevant section of the helpful Landover Baptist Church's forum for those who are interested: http://www.landoverbaptist.net/forumdisplay.php?f=42 (Who said Americans don't 'get' irony?) You might like the contributions of Mrs. Mary Whitford (Ladies of Landover Senior VP, One of the Truest Christians™ Ever, Mama Grizzly and formerly Sister Mary Maria True Christian™) Posted by WmTrevor, Sunday, 27 October 2013 9:59:58 AM
| |
WmTrvor,
Bit strapped for time this morning...but can't go past hilarity when I see it. Under the "not so obvious" signs of homosexuality: "Enjoys gardening but isn't a Mexican't or Oriental Goes to proper sporting events but just stares at the players instead of cheering Goes to "hair salons" instead of barber shops "Metros*xual" Over 25 and not yet married Does anything with flowers, including being submissive enough to give them to his "wife" Goes to a gym (that isn't The Taut Christian) Votes Republican, but only for "moderates" Watches MSNBC Complains about Fox News Listens to "pop" music Is a public school teacher Claims to be an "atheist" Claims to be a "buddhist" Claims to be a "catholic" Let's face it, if he's not a True Christian™, he probably relishes any chance he has to spit in the face of Jesus Cooks in the kitchen instead of on a BBQ Only plays touch football Is against hunting Hates guns Paints his walls any color except white Can tell the difference between "white" and "off-white" Is anti-American Doesn't want to be American Protests against wars Anti-capital punishment (no surprise, because once God's Law is back in effect in this country...) Wears any jewelry other than a manly watch Yes, that includes a "wedding ring", something only today's feminized men insist on wearing " That should keep me laughing most of the morning. Triple LOL! Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 27 October 2013 10:14:11 AM
| |
More time on my hands than I thought.
This is fascinating. More..... "Refuses a side of ranch with his dinner at Applebees Wears sandals Belongs to a union Has long hair Owns a model train set Has ever been on unemployment Owns a car that is considered mid size or smaller Has ever cried. Knows how to "manscape"" "Pretends to be "tolerant" and says "to each their own" Calls negras "African Americans" Doesn't know how to fix an engine Calls dogs "cute" Watches musicals Likes "ethnic music" Doesn't believe in home schooling Has S*x And The City on DVD" "Listens to NPR Doesn't drive an SUV (bonus faggotry points if he uses public transportation) Reads the JYT Over 18 but still has a waist size of 30 or less Wears clothing from Abercrombie & Fitch or American Apparel (bonus faggotry points if it fits correctly) Vacations in Christ-hating Europistan Enters the city limits of any city of 500,000 or more for any reason other than work or evangelism Likes ethnic food Actually enjoys clothes shopping" "owns a MacBook - has a Twitter account - does anything whatsoever with his eyebrows - collects anything (other than firearms) - has had more than one prostate exam " "Enjoys professional wrestling Doesn't care for decent, good old amateur wrestling Has muscles too big to come from farm work or other honest labor Puts anything in his hair other than classic Brylcreem and a comb Plays with children Eats fruit (especially bananas) Knows what kind of mushroom that is on his plate Dances" Apparently - "This site is best viewed while holding an open King James Bible"....who'd a thunk it? (Well, I'm obviously not homosexual because I homeschool....Phewww!) Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 27 October 2013 10:26:54 AM
|
Got another trouser hem, have you...which just by chance belongs to a woman on this forum.
Having fun, twisting, distorting and misrepresenting Suse rhetoric, are we?
(Must say, I was fascinated by your suggestion on Graham's thread to ban people from calling out trolling behaviour)
: )
..........
Suse,
Here's some sage advice from Tony Lavis for just such a situation:
"......some trolls are just jerks and there is nothing you can do about them.
Whether they be lonely trolls seeking attention or jerk trolls the best treatment is not to feed them: it strengthens jerks trolls and it conditions lonely trolls in the wrong way. A lonely troll who gets fed too much - especially after midnight - can turn into a jerk troll and you can't fix them after that.
Trolls feed on attention: when you sense a troll in your midst try to give it a wide berth. If it engages you personally remain silent and avoid any form of retaliation. I know it can be hard but in this case you need to do what Jesus would do and turn the other cheek. When a troll gets hungry enough it will eventually crawl away and seek sustenance on another forum."