The Forum > General Discussion > New Marriage laws for the ACT
New Marriage laws for the ACT
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Page 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- ...
- 35
- 36
- 37
-
- All
Posted by Suseonline, Saturday, 26 October 2013 5:55:08 PM
| |
"Who on earth would CHOOSE to be gay in this harsh world?"
Well, Suse, apparently the Gordons did. Posted by Is Mise, Saturday, 26 October 2013 6:28:48 PM
| |
The who, Is Mise?
Sorry, you have lost me. Posted by Suseonline, Saturday, 26 October 2013 6:36:21 PM
| |
Okay, Is Mise, oh ye of little faith, its not god enough for you that I have been anointed by his holyness Pope Imbecile himself, you want references for my miracle revelations. Here it is! This 5000 year old video clip of Pope Imbecile III delivering the holy message on gay marriage in the ACT. The video formed part of a much larger DVD that was uncovered late one night, personally by me, in the Seven Eleven Store in Dapto New South Wales. So much for those 4000 year old Chicko Rolls found in the Dead Sea, my stuff out ranks that by 1,000 years, can't top that, its from the Book of Cyril! Many a ecclesiastical scholar has tried to interpolate the most holy of holy books, the Book of Cyril, without success, until I came along. Like Moses the Ark builder my miracles spiritual revelations come to me in dreams, mostly after late night drinking secessions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqaQ_Bhgmrc Posted by Paul1405, Saturday, 26 October 2013 6:43:39 PM
| |
Suseonline, "If they practice safe sex, like everyone else should as well, then the risks are minimal"
"Should"! That is the convenient 'out' that is always misleading. Then how come the risk-taking, bare-backing gays don't do that? <Report reveals jump in HIV infection rate Australian HIV infection rates increased by more than 8 per cent in 2011, according to a study to be released today. The annual surveillance study into sexually transmitted diseases in Australia shows the latest rise contributes to a 50 per cent growth in infection rates over the past 10 years. The report also shows diseases like gonorrhoea and chlamydia are becoming more common. There were 1,137 new HIV diagnoses in 2011, up from 719 in 1999. The director of the National Centre in HIV Social Research, Professor John de Wit, says there is also concern that as many as 30 per cent of HIV cases could be going undiagnosed. "While Australia has one of the highest rates of HIV testing in the world among gay men, we see that about 60 per cent of gay men have tested in the past 12 months which means there could be a substantial number of people living with HIV who are not aware," he said. Much of the increase is put down to unsafe sex among gay men, who Mr de Wit says now view HIV/AIDS as no longer life threatening. .. Health researchers believe 6,000 to 10,000 people in Australia have HIV but do not know it.> http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-10-17/report-on-hiv-gonorrhoea-chlamydia-infection-rate/4317174 to be continued.. Posted by onthebeach, Saturday, 26 October 2013 6:44:32 PM
| |
continued..
How come there is transmission to heterosexual women? It is noted that once again you studiously avoided this question asked of you previously, "Doubtless for starters Suseonline can shed light for all on how sexual contact is spreading AIDS to heterosexual women, when she claims that 'gays' are born and apart from those who she says are 'forced' to have relationships and sex with women, wouldn't otherwise entertain that disgusting (to them) concept". Contrary to your positive spin on anal sex, women should be very concerned about the serious risks that can affect their fertility and threaten life. It should be a legal requirement for all who have ever had anal sex to disclose that fact to their intending sexual partner. Regarding condoms, which Suseonline imagines are proof against HIV and other STDs, the answer is that they are useful in reducing infection, but are NO guarantee of safety at all. Most people would be aware of the uses and limitations of condoms. Posted by onthebeach, Saturday, 26 October 2013 6:47:48 PM
|
Where, exactly, did you get your hysterical comment "The back passage increases the risks thirty fold and introduces additional risks." ?
Thirty fold?
What, thirty times stronger syphilis? Lol!
If they practice safe sex, like everyone else should as well, then the risks are minimal.
Oh rubbish to you Josephus. I can't imagine you 'know' many lesbians at all.
How many women who have had abusive relationships with men actually DO turn to lesbian sex after leaving abusive men?
There aren't nearly that many lesbians out there to put any truth to that bizarre statement.
Ladies, are there any of you that, after an awful relationship with a man, just then decided "well ok, he was awful, I will now go out and have sex with women",, if they had never before been even secretly attracted to women?
Anyone?
What about you guys? Have any of you had an awful breakup with a woman and then thought about having sex with a guy, when the notion had never occured to you before?
Hello?
My best friend has a lovely son who was so obviously gay from about the age of 3 yesrs old that no one else but the family were surprised when he 'came out' at the age of 19.
They were a very religious family whose father was very homophobic, and the boy never even met another gay person until he left school!
He even tried going out with a girl for a year before finally breaking her heart and telling her he was gay.
What do you think of that Josephus?
Who on earth would CHOOSE to be gay in this harsh world?