Loudmouth,

"Issues, Poirot - otherwise just stay in the sand-pit with the other kiddies."

That's a laugh coming from you - on the subject of climate science.

Here are the "issues" from someone actually qualified to write about them.

http://m.livescience.com/39957-climate-change-deniers-must-stop-distorting-the-evidence.html

The Australian, The Daily Telegraph, and others
in the Murdoch fold misrepresented key facts from
leaked copies of the draft IPCC report and left out
many others - and here we have an entire thread
based on that information.

Foxy,

"....here we have an entire thread
based on that information."

Welcome to denierland.....

Climate Council.

Crowd funding $800,000 in three days.

I reckon that would have come from the contractors who made the 8 billion from those unnecessary desalination plants.

If they can keep Flannery in the fraud business, there will be a few more billion of tax payer funds to rip off building all sorts of pie in the sky stupidity.

Windmills anyone?

Poirot,

Oy. NO, I know bugger-all about climate science (my main field was economic geography), but the key outcomes interest me, and what we can do about them. For instance:

* have average world temperatures risen by barely a degree in a century or not? Yes or no ? True or false ?

* have sea-levels risen by barely two inches in 120 years, or not ? Yes or no ? True or false ?

* are these minor problems amenable to human amelioration or not ? Yes or no ? True or false ?

I respectfully suggest you find the courage somewhere to answer these questions, or stay in the sand-pit.

Cheers :)

Joe