Rudd had better call an election before too many wake up that he is conning the Aus voting public. Already those that have read the signed documents are finding massive holes. It is not as he said it was on Friday.

Some of the differences that apparently have came to light.
Not ALL arrivals will be sent to PNG, they are 'liable' only to be sent. According to PNG, the number is not unlimited. PNG has not said it will accept the 'economic migrants' only the 'refugees' Refugees will be supported by Aus financially with no time limit.
Why advertise in Aus media and in English.

Rudd has done more backflips on the illegals thing than a circus performer. Before 2007 he said he would 'turn back' the boats. After 2007 he played the good Samaritan and opened the doors to the illegals. He also caved in to the illegals on the Oceanic Viking and ferried them to Aus. Now he wants us to believe that he is tough on illegals and will send some to PNG, but tells us ALL will go there.

This change is not designed as a long term solution, but merely designed to alter the public perception long enough to get Rudd elected.

Just look at his track record of untruths and failures. Perhaps the financial benefits he has promised PNG will come to light eventually.

I suggest we make Rudd to live in western Sydney.

At least Rudd has put up an idea .
Abbott has just said they will turn the boats back.
But how?

Suse,

Yeah I wonder who's the best pollie.

The one who strikes a deal to toss compassion to the wind.

Or the one who merely tosses the idea around in slogan form.

(Pair of stinkers)

Suseonline - If Abbott gives away what he will do, if it is a good plan Rudd could copy it.

Don't show your full hand until you are in power.

Personally I don't trust either of them.

I agree...I don't trust either of them either.

If Abbott feels he has to come up with something 'better' than Rudd has, then his idea might be even worse!

Papua New Guinea doesn't have a good track record for education, healthcare or domestic violence rates. If the vast majority of the Asylum Seekers are found to be legitimate refugees, why should we banish them to such a place?

That is only a slightly better solution than continuing to encourage them to risk death by travelling here in small boats.