The Forum > General Discussion > Public Confidence in Police in NSW.
Public Confidence in Police in NSW.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
:) :) :)
To some extent, police are victims of the broken political system, however one has to wonder why honest cops and / or their union don't make as much as a peep about establishment of a truly independent review entity, also removing traffic services from 'proper' policing. As I've said previously, I don't know a lot about policing in the mexican states but corruption is, and has always been rampant in Queensland. Furthermore we have a very 'interesting' ethical services command, the previous boss of which is enjoying some free accommodation as a consequence of importing military style weapons for sale to certain hard gentlemen. The police union is also 'interesting' having a certifiable lunatic at the helm. If those aren't sufficient reason for cynicism, the present police minister made multiple demands for a royal commission while in opposition, but funnily enough he refuses to acknowledge this now he's in the hot seat.
Its obvious that police will always be targets for criticism, whether justified or otherwise, nevertheless the public have every right to expect an absolutely squeaky clean police service in which any & all questions re propriety are addressed openly / transparently / honestly by a truly independent organization immune from undue influence. No amount of verbiage can ever justify police investigating police. Justice must not only be done, but far more importantly, it must be **SEEN** to be done. In theory at least, the CMC & equivalents (ICAC ??) perform this role, however in typical political fashion, interference is a fact of life. As always, Queensland leads the way in terms of how **NOT** to run a review organization. One area in which Queensland has adopted the national standard is in the use of 'independent'. Instead of the dictionary meaning, the common political usage is stacking the entity in question with compliant drones willing to do whatever is in the best interests of those who appointed them.