The Forum > General Discussion > Public Confidence in Police in NSW.
Public Confidence in Police in NSW.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- ...
- 6
- 7
- 8
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Suspending officers from general duties in a situation like this is not pr-judging their guilt or innocence, but is a reasonable protective measure to ensure that public confidence in police is maintained. Like all citizens police should have the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.
If allegations of this seriousness had been made against a doctor, a nurse or a teacher then it is almost certain that conditions would be placed on their employment to protect the public pending the outcome of any criminal proceedings, it should be no different for police. These police were given full procedural fairness in the Coroner’s Court who made a series of damning findings about their conduct on the night and perjury in the Court. To maintain public confidence in police their suspension from front line policing pending criminal proceedings is essential. In no way could such action be seen as a denial of due process, but rather a reasonable response to the potential risks of the situation. What is needed is an independent and properly resourced police oversight body that has the power to make binding recommendations. Until then public confidence in police will be tested.