The Forum > General Discussion > Is it racist?
Is it racist?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- ...
- 64
- 65
- 66
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Its clear thats been the case here. I thought the player was supposed to be a big strong (some would say (erroneously) 'heroic' male). as things transpired, he now looks like a namby-pamby mummys boy. Whats the world coming to when people who like to portray a public image of uber-masculine take to crying piteously like a new-born baby ??
As for the nonsense about changing word usage, virtually everyone in this country has some ancestral events way back in the mists of time that could conceivably construe discrimination. There were certainly some very interesting happenings in the days of my ancient ancestors (for the peanut gallery, there were **NO** convicts) but why should I give a rats about stuff than happened hundreds of years back. When its all said and done, the other side probably deserved their fate :)
Just to get the blood pressure of our do-gooder friends racing, I have for many years in a particular area used a certain indigenous 'title' that upsets the politically correct lunatic fringe no end. Funnily enough, I have the full approval of the relevant people to use the term and in fact its a source of considerable merriment to them. Don't even think about aggro, the elders have a hard time not splitting their sides when they encounter the usage. Point of this ramble is that a lot of the terms which offend do-gooders are of no consequence whatever to those with a direct connection.