Here we go again with the vile racism that seems to thrive on OLO these days.

I will refrain from commenting further because it is always me that gets banned.

Mikk,
Facts can't be "racist".
Calling someone a coward and a shirker is not "racist'.
Calling someone sexist or misogynist is not "Racist".
Saying that "Asylum Seekers" should go back to where they belong is not "racist".

Illegal immigrants are on part of the problem, what about our current Irish issue? The overwhelmingly male Irish immigrants are worse than the Sri Lankans and Afghans, plus in contrast to refugees they really are stealing jobs .
Immigration needs to end, we don't need any more of the world's cast offs, malcontents and criminals, be they Britons, Chinese or Afghans.
Why should we be the world's back up plan if they fail at life in their country of birth?
The Irish need to fix their country, so do the Afghans, Iranians and Sudanese.

rehctub - Quoting you "Phillip, where did I mention indigenous?"

Please read what I wrote again, at no point did I say you mentioned it, you will note I used it to mean the people of the country.
for example.
Australia, it means all naturalized Australians.
America, it means all naturalized Americans.
So on for any country.

Re-written in any country the number of naturalized citizens who are offenders will outnumber foreign offenders.

mikk - Quote "Here we go again with the vile racism"

Please be so kind as to point out what parts are racist.

Phillip, I am of the opinion that Aboriginal folk are indigenous. Even then, only full bloods in my view.

As far as locals being responsible for the bulk of crimes, you believe what you want and I will believe what I want.

rehctub - I think my wording confused you but I think we both believe on this occasion the same which is.

1) In Australia more crimes are committed by Australians than by refugees.

BUT the governments figure of 45 times more likely to commit crimes is by CREATIVE manipulation of available data.

They claim quote"A department spokeswoman said that ''a handful'' - or five or less - had been charged with a crime." This is totally wrong as I pointed out because I gave examples of more than 5.

Also they conveniently left out the hundreds of crimes committed inside the detention centers