The Forum > General Discussion > Fighting two wars
Fighting two wars
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
This is being done to protect us from the threat of terrorism.
I do not think that any lives have been threatened let alone lost due to terrorism imported from a foreign country.
We have had a lot of lives lost in another war which is presently raging and will continue to do so perpetually. This is the war that nature is waging against us and is exacerbated by global warming.
The bush fires that are causing devastation all over the eastern states at the moment is one aspect of this war.
We are fighting this with one hand tied behind our backs due to a lack of the proper tools.
The helicopters that are in use together with a few crop dusters are ineffective and there are better aircraft available.
The Canadian purpose designed and built Bombardier would be a tremendous boost to protecting the tinder dry land we live in.
In an average mission of six nautical miles (11 kilometres) distance from water to fire, it can complete nine drops within an hour and deliver 14,589 U.S. gallons (55,233 litres) of fire suppressant.
It is an Amphibious Aircraft so is suitable for general duties also when not fire bombing.
Surely it would be better to obtain a fleet of these aircraft and have the RAAF operate them than to spend multi millions on a futuristic fighter that we really do not need and then ship them overseas to fight a war that is not only unnecessary but unwinnable